Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham

One other thing though...in 1918 the population was different (both in numbers and in controllability)...add to that the extended “incubation period”...and we might be looking at more like 3 months of limited contact to be sure this thing is shut down. Even then I would expect pockets of risk (like “hot spots” when a forest fire is under control).


62 posted on 10/03/2014 7:55:52 PM PDT by DJlaysitup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: DJlaysitup

A lockdown/ daytime curfew/ quarantine for three months might be better. You want an emergency of this sort to be a one time thing, you want to extinguish the disease on the first try.

I figure that hotspots will be similar to where it cropped up now, a community with a high population of immigrants both legal and illegal from west Africa. People who have a habit of living on the margin of the law are going to skirt curfews and quarantines as well.

The real culprits in my mind are the politicians who have been enabling illegal immigration for decades, and who have promoting the immigration flood from the third world. Ebola and jihad are just two of the plagues that non-existent borders will bring us.


77 posted on 10/03/2014 8:36:01 PM PDT by Pelham ("This is how they do it in Mexico"- California State Motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson