To: SeekAndFind
Wait, 10?? What'd they do, just decide to skip 9 since the odd-numbered ones are the ones that work?
39 posted on
10/02/2014 1:16:15 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Still Thinking
RE: Wait, 10?? What’d they do, just decide to skip 9 since the odd-numbered ones are the ones that work?
Who knows? Maybe to distance themselves from the bad experience people are getting with 8?
45 posted on
10/02/2014 1:35:52 PM PDT by
SeekAndFind
(If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
To: Still Thinking; SeekAndFind
Wait, 10?? What'd they do, just decide to skip 9 since the odd-numbered ones are the ones that work?Actually, I am REALLY happy it's 10... I have 20 years of code, some of which differentiates between Win9x, WinXP, and etc... Probably quite a bit of it does something different if it finds 'windows 9' in the version. Especially batches... Hunnerts of them. That may well be why they skipped Win9, and I thank them for it!
46 posted on
10/02/2014 1:56:43 PM PDT by
roamer_1
(Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson