Not trying to go tit for tat, but the WHO site completely refutes what you posted.
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/ebola/faq-ebola/en/
This has been consistently what I read.
Honest, not trying to get into a pissing contest. But we need to make sure people reading this stuff can see there is contradictory information.
Fair enough.
CDC considers just being within 3 feet of an Ebola patient for an extended period of time to be a risk factor, albeit a low risk factor. 3 feet is about how far micro droplets of moisture can travel when you exhale out of your mouth. Aka air transmissible in droplets, but not truly airborne.
WHO says not infectious before symptoms. Plenty of scientists disagree with respect to this strain. I provided one link.
Just search for "Ebola in semen breast milk after recovery" for tons of links about that - some credible, some admittedly junk.
Final note: At this point, I have as much faith in the WHO as I do the UN.
Keep in mind the WHO have been pushing to keep air access at normal levels, which is how we got cases in the wild here in the US. I am concerned that their information is not completely accurate as they may be trying to prevent the economic impacts associated with isolation.