Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama had accurate intelligence since BEFORE the 2012 election
Daily Mail ^ | 29 September 2014 | David Martosko,

Posted on 09/30/2014 3:40:10 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse

Unless someone very senior has been shredding the president's daily briefings and telling him that the dog ate them, highly accurate predictions about ISIL have been showing up in the Oval Office since before the 2012 election,' said a national security staffer in the Obama administration who is familiar with the content of intelligence briefings.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: impeach; isis; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: LeoWindhorse

Obama lied and people died.


21 posted on 09/30/2014 4:58:26 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: IMR 4350
Obama wasn’t supposed to be reelected until Benghazi made it necessary to be reelected to do the cover up.

ISIS was supposed to be Mitt Romney’s problem that Hillary could run against in 2016 with the claim the republicans had gotten us into another war in Iraq.

I've got to think about that. It's a whole other level of treasonous planning.

23 posted on 09/30/2014 5:22:32 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

The dems had a tribute to Peanuts Carter at their convention right before Benghazi even though Obama has never once called Carter for advice.

For 4 years Obama had done everything he could to dispel that he was Peanuts II.

If you are trying to separate yourself from Peanuts you don’t praise him at your convention without a reason.

Benghazi was supposed to be a hostage situation like with Carter.

The plan was Hillary would claim the attack/hostage taking at Benghazi was a “spontaneous” response to a video which no one above the level of idiot was supposed to believe.

Hillary’s minions would then run wild with the “October Surprise II” that Mitt Romney and the republicans had collaborated with terrorist to make Obama look like Peanuts Carter.

The repubs would then turn around and claim the terrorist had simply picked up from the news the dems intent to praise Carter at their convention and planned the attack around what was in the news.

Not only would Hillary have 4 years of nonstop Romney/repubs had collaborated with terrorist, Hillary would also have a cover story of how the terrorist got all the weapons from Libya, it was the republicans fault.

Hillary’s an attorney and she is also a follower of Saul Alinsky.

She will created her own defense by blaming someone else for what she has done then let the person she has blamed create a defense for themselves which in turn creates a defense for her.


24 posted on 09/30/2014 6:10:27 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

It’s a complicated plan, and complicated plans don’t usually work as expected.

It’s also a bit paranoid. My feeling is that many things that appear to be conspiracy can be explained by stupidity, greed, accident, and error. But, when there is a true conspiracy, its usually much worse than anyone could have imagined it would be.

Is this one of those cases? Possibly.


25 posted on 09/30/2014 6:18:09 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Al Qaeda doc recovered in Afghanistan, it’s a letter from Osama bin Laden to Mullah Omar, it was listed as doc# AFGP-2002-600321 in what was the CTC at West Point’s Harmony Database.

In the doc OBL makes a passing comment that the media is 90% of the preparation for the battle.

In short news is being orchestrated as preparation for the attacks.

The praise of Carter at the dems convention was the orchestrated news story for the attack.

This isn’t something I just dreamed up, there is documentation from al Qaeda to support it.


26 posted on 09/30/2014 6:47:07 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse
annul the 2012 election result

Romney got full press briefings, too. Yet he backed off on Benghazi, the issue where he could've brought up Obama's inattention to foreign threats and weapons getting to terrorists.

Romney failed us.

27 posted on 09/30/2014 6:51:24 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

Simply put - he was

TOO LAZY

to pay it any attention.


28 posted on 09/30/2014 6:55:48 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

You cannot be sure that Romney got an ACCURATE briefing from Obama’s people!!! I’d bet $1000.00 that he DIDN:T get an ACCURATE one!!


29 posted on 09/30/2014 6:58:00 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

He (Romney) had enough information to not back off on Benghazi. We all did.


30 posted on 09/30/2014 7:00:20 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

Maybe it wasn’t the dog;maybe it was Val somebody.


31 posted on 09/30/2014 8:20:41 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson