Posted on 09/29/2014 7:04:54 AM PDT by Biggirl
On "Fox News Sunday," Dr. Ben Carson said there is "certainly the potential" for widespread anarchy in the United States within the next couple of years.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Lady Jane.......you got the darn right functioning MoJo!!! I like ya and I gor ur back!!! Onward to victory!!! House & Senaate = Rs!!!
Preppaers’ PING!!
Hat tip to Biggirl for the heads up!
You have zero knowledge of American history>
The Battle Of Athens
http://www.americanheritage.com/content/battle-athens
“We have ZERO ‘popular coup’ history.”
A massive Revolutionary War and a Civil War. Seems we have a history of war.
What do you think are the odds of a Cruz-Carson ticket in 2016?
>>We have ZERO ‘popular coup’ history. You think this is France? Some African hellhole? ISIS?<<
Harlem riots 1964
Watts riots 1965
L.A. riots 1992
skip to...
walmart riots 2013
Furgeson riots 2014
All based on the desire of those who do not work to take from those who do in the cloak of “race.”
Very good indeed!
CWII Spark Ping!
I hope Dr. Carson is right. That would mean the sheep are awakening and becoming aware before it is too late!
Dr. Carson is part of the problem when it comes to the 2nd amendment:
from 2013
Appearing on Glenn Beck‘s radio show this past week, Dr. Benjamin Carson took a vastly different stance from most conservatives on the issue of gun control, claiming you shouldn’t be able to own semi-automatic weapons in large cities.
Carson became a newfound conservative hero last month when he spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast and laid out a series of criticisms of ObamaCare, political correctness, and tax policy right in front of the president himself. Many called the speech “inappropriate” given the apolitical nature of the event, but many conservatives lauded Carson for his “bold” and “sensible” suggestions for policy reform.
Asked by Beck for his thoughts on the Second Amendment, Carson gave the popular pro-gun argument: “There’s a reason for the Second Amendment; people do have the right to have weapons.”
But when asked whether people should be allowed to own “semi-automatic weapons,” the doctor replied: “It depends on where you live.”
“I think if you live in the midst of a lot of people, and I’m afraid that that semi-automatic weapon is going to fall into the hands of a crazy person, I would rather you not have it,” Carson elaborated.
However, if you live “out in the country somewhere by yourself” and want to own a semi-automatic weapon, he added, “I’ve no problem with that.”
Don’t forget Watts, Chicago, Detroit, and who knows how many others in 1968-9-70
I hadn’t thought of that. Of course, if I were the opposition I would infiltrate the Tea Party - filled with really good folks - and get them agitated to only vote for totally pure candidates. You’re right. Or as they say here: Your right. LOL
1. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.
"he was overthrown in an army coup" synonyms: seizure of power, coup d'état, putsch, overthrow, takeover, deposition;
OK that's not exactly a small example... seems you and a few others have a point here...
Ummm, I could be wrong on this one...
Somewhere between zero and none. Cruz has more sense than to fill is ticket with an amateur.
I agree we would have been at war in previous centuries, but I also think we have a lot to lose even now so people still need to be pushed further. However, we are at a point where being an American means little, but being a foreign in America means everything. We are also being told to stop being ourselves and be liberals and that is stretching our patience as well. We are also being imprisoned, fined, and punished for being Americans.
Push is coming to shove and we are seeing the cracks already whereby the people on whole no longer see government, the police, or any authoritarian agency as their friend.
Obviously, the feds are not our friends.
The fact that about 51% of the voting public re-elected this travesty of an administration means that we are no longer a united country.
We will survive the empty suit named Obama. But long term we won't survive continued political union with any group of people who re-elected him in 2012. We must remove ourselves from them if we hope to secure our existence as a people.
It means that the 51% have to leave my country, because quite obviously, we're not countrymen. We stand for very different things. We have nothing in common. And so we need to do a territorial split.
The good news is that most Rats live on the coasts, or are concentrated in urban islands in flyover country.
The way forward thus seems pretty clear - we need to shed the coasts and transfer the Rats infesting our beautiful Red State homeland to the coasts, and then boot the coasts out of the Union.
I really don't think the process necessarily entails a sort of Road Warrior collapse. The feds backed down at Cliven Bundy's Ranch, they'll back down again.
We can start with things like Nullification of federal laws by the States. When push comes to shove, the feds will wimp out, because, well, they're wimps.
We have the trained veterans and tens of millions of weapons. We manufacture the goods, mine the coal, frack the gas, generate the electricity, butcher the hogs and stack the wheat.
They have federally-funded banks and universities, government government and more government, enormous numbers of lumpenproles on the dole, and of course Pajama Boy.
They might need us, but we sure don't need them.
Red State Secession Now.
I have been listening to Mr. Cahn lately and other speakers regarding the Blood Moons on the Jim Bakker ministry show. On Oct 13 he will have Alvida King on. For the several weeks the discussion was on prophcy, blood moons and the rapture.
Well, he is probably right. On the other hand, if you define anarchy as ignoring, or breaking the laws, then we likely already have widespread anarchy.
There are so many laws, including nonsensical ones, that we have all probably broken several before lunch time and didn’t even know it.
It seems to me that both parties have sold the American people out to the wealthy elite (individuals and global businesses for example). They just say what you want to hear to get elected, but they enact very similar laws per the behind the scenes puppeteers.
So we are going to h#ll in a handbasket, just one party seems to be taking us quicker than the other.
Not Progressive, But Rather Retrograde Government.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3208992/posts
...government in reverse gear to a time before our English and Colonial ancestors fought, bled and died to secure freedom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.