[khelus]

Re: When Monsanto tells you GMO's haven't been proven harmful, the small print says 'because there was no testing.

Lol - no testing? At all? How do they know that it grows?

I love it when know-nothings blunder into discussions where they parrot junk from social media.

Please tell us more about the lack of testing.

I love it more when those who lack facts resort to ridicule.

In the context of my post 'no testing' = no testing to back up Monsanto's claims of GMO's not being harmful. But then again you knew that didn't you ?

[Mase]

back up Monsanto's claims of GMO's not being harmful.

You've been eating genetically modified food your entire life. As a matter of fact, every single agricultural product available in our food supply has been genetically modified. And we are living longer, on average, than at any other time in human history.

Sounds like a well designed test to me, that has delivered results that are impossible to argue with. But here you are.....

[corkoman]

You seem to know about this subject. Tell us more about the "no testing" thing.

How much are developers willing to invest in technology without testing it? The regulations for food approval are similar to pharmaceuticals. But mabye you know details of how they were able to skirt those regs?

Or are you just spouting off from one of your Facebook groups?