Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
According to public law, the words are required. Congress specified the exact wording and gave no one authority to delete it.

Read the full article at the link. The statute contains a cross-reference to a different statute which says that an "affirmation" can always be substituted for an "oath."

31 posted on 09/11/2014 10:56:45 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

“The statute contains a cross-reference...”

No, the statue does not. Some legal software will provide you with cross references, and that helps to build a legal case. One can also look at notes provided by Congress for fuller explanation, when they exist. But those are things COURTS do. The military takes a law at face value.

An affirmation usually means you have a religious objection to swearing an oath, as I do.


39 posted on 09/11/2014 11:11:32 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson