Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: henkster

Thanks for the post. I didn’t know the Sherman actually did well in trained hands and good leadership.


39 posted on 09/08/2014 12:43:41 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie

You got a sneak preview of a post scheduled for next week on Homer’s WW2 daily thread.


40 posted on 09/08/2014 12:44:42 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie

The Sherman was the 5-1 tank. They would send 5 Sherman’s against the Panther4 or a Tiger, 4 Sherman’s were bait and get blown up, while the 5th sneaks up and popped a cap in jerry’s ass. Standard tactics. The US Army had first choice at a tank with the T-34 suspension but passed.

The Sherman was a steel body bag. Using a gasoline engine made it worse but faster.


95 posted on 09/08/2014 2:59:13 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson