Sorry for not pinging you in my response a few posts back. Those FR threads of last April provide a number of alternatives to Firefox. Those mentioned, among others, included Palemoon, lynx and Netsurf.
I don't see any logic in your thinking, but if you are against Firefox, why would you suggest Palemoon?
"Pale Moon is an Open Source, Firefox-based web browser"
As in the same Firefox you think is pure evil. So how does that logic work?
Why don't you consider that people, ideas, and organizations are different than products. And using a free product doesn't support or enable its producers.