Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DWP To Explore Pricing Tiers Based On Residents’ Water Usage
CBSLA.com) ^ | September 2, 2014 8:41 AM | Jon Baird

Posted on 09/02/2014 3:05:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin

LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — Would adding a more complex pricing structure at the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (DWP) encourage customers to cut back on their water usage?

KNX 1070’s Jon Baird reports a recent UCLA study found that while some residents have stepped up conservation efforts, others have leveled off as the statewide drought continues to worsen.

Last month, City Councilmen Felipe Fuentes and Mike Bonin introduced a motion (PDF) to have the DWP explore a number of conservation policy changes, including “an increasing block rate structure for DWP customers with more than two tiers, in which the unit price for water rises as the volume of water consumption increases.”

The proposal – outlined in a June study by researchers at UCLA’s California Center for Sustainable Communities – calls for implementing the revised multi-tiered pricing structure for residential water use that, under one option, could be used in combination with seasonal rate hikes in which prices increase during the summer months.

Stephanie Pincetl, director of the California Center for Sustainable Communities at UCLA, said the study’s findings showed wealthier customers with bigger lots use as much as three times the amount of water that other residential customers use.

One potential solution according to Pincetl: the adoption of household water meters that measure indoor and outdoor water use separately.

“Water prices should reflect the amount of water people use,” said Pincetl.

In January, California Gov. Jerry Brown declared a state of emergency in response to California’s drought, asking residents to reduce their water consumption by 20 percent. Recent surveys have found water use has declined by just 5 percent statewide since that time.

Edward Randolph with the California Public Utilities Commission said when state regulators added extra tiers to electric rates to encourage electricity conservation earlier this year, the results were mixed – and often an unwelcome surprise.

“You don’t understand you’ve gone into the next tier until you get your bill,” said Randolph.

It wasn’t immediately clear when the DWP would report its findings to the City Council’s Energy and Environment Committee.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: california; costofliving; drought; water

1 posted on 09/02/2014 3:05:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All; BenLurkin

Conservative Californians: Come to Texas. We have MUCH LOWER housing costs, lower taxes, jobs galore at every level and FREEDOM.


2 posted on 09/02/2014 3:07:49 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Bwahahaha! Go on conserve that water...then they’ll charge you more anyway due to crumbling infrastructure! Don’t believe me...just ask Cleveland!


3 posted on 09/02/2014 3:09:45 PM PDT by EBH (And the angel poured out his cup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What...?

Many cities already do this....water rates based on usage is not a new idea...

I guess the rich libtards have been catered too....


4 posted on 09/02/2014 3:10:40 PM PDT by Popman (Jesus Christ Alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A few decades ago, northeast Oklahoma was having a severe drought. Several of the city and rural water districts came on TV and asked people to cut back on their water usage.

People did.

About 6 months later, those water districts notified their customers that they lost too much revenue that year due to the lessened water use by customers. Thus, the districts were going to raise water rates.

==


5 posted on 09/02/2014 3:15:08 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; EBH

First, farming uses 80% of the water consumed in California, so conservations efforts aimed at the remaining 20% is not going to work.

Second, as mentioned by EBH, we will not see a reduction in our monthly bill. The excuse will be that we did such a good job conserving water that rates had to be increased to meet operating expenses.


6 posted on 09/02/2014 3:16:49 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I am a conservative Californian and I love Texas (I have a very dear old friend there) but I like my climate here, right on the northish coast: fog, drizzle, wind, mizzle...no mosquitoes, no flies.
It wreaks havoc on the hair but it's great for the skin. I'd rather have good skin. I can always fix the hair but...good skin is preferred.
7 posted on 09/02/2014 3:28:58 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

I haven’t noticed a mosquito problem here. Lots of grasshoppers and crickets this Summer, but they don’t do anything to me.


8 posted on 09/02/2014 3:33:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

In California PGE was allowed to tier the rates many years ago. Noone, and I mean noone, can stay under what they call lifeline usage. Ours is always in the third tier. Doesn’t matter the prices just keep going up.


9 posted on 09/02/2014 3:46:04 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Government: a monopoly that can’t break even or better and is forced to ration instead of planning ahead.

Aren’t you glad they’re in charge of health care now?


10 posted on 09/02/2014 3:51:15 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Barbara Streisand was buying almost a 1000 dollars of water per month, 10 years ago, I wonder how much water she uses at that house today?


11 posted on 09/02/2014 4:03:23 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Celebs have to pay utilities?

I figured they’d get it for free “just for being there”


12 posted on 09/02/2014 4:04:23 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Probably need to give it to them for free like they do in Detroit .... you know, social justice.


13 posted on 09/02/2014 6:03:15 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (If you are reading this then you are probably one of the NWO designated 6.5 billion excess people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I haven’t noticed a mosquito problem here. Lots of grasshoppers and crickets this Summer, but they don’t do anything to me.

They are all bird food, as far as I'm concerned.

14 posted on 09/02/2014 7:25:04 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson