Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
Rather than "[peering] at meaning by the guttering candlelight of a Standard English frozen in time," Self writes of the virtues of the "high-wattage of the living, changing language."

Fine.

If you want to write a literary work through a "living, changing language," do so.

But you don't have to entirely disregard Standard English to do it.

Gimmickry.

3 posted on 08/31/2014 4:46:08 PM PDT by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Flycatcher
But you don't have to entirely disregard Standard English to do it.

Elmore Leonard's view on the subject:

"If it sounds like writing, I rewrite it. . . I can't allow what we learned in English composition to disrupt the sound and rhythm of the narrative. It's my attempt to remain invisible, not distract the reader from the story with obvious writing. . ."

7 posted on 08/31/2014 4:52:47 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Conservatism is the political disposition of grown-ups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson