Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moral Relativists In The University: They Aren’t Who You Think They Are
The Aquila Report ^ | 8-24-14 | Collin Garbarino

Posted on 08/24/2014 1:44:13 PM PDT by ReformationFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Tax-chick

Nisbet’s 1988 ‘The Present Age’ begins with a look at the what Nisbet regarded as a major change in American government, the Presidency of Woodrow Wilson.

This is something that Glenn Beck has been popularizing recently but I seriously doubt that Beck has ever heard of Nisbet much less read him.


21 posted on 08/24/2014 4:07:24 PM PDT by Pelham (California, what happens when you won't deport illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
As P.J. O'Rourke observed, "If you think there was some Golden Age in the past in which everything was better, I have one word for you: dentistry."

Central heating, wash and wear clothing, out of season produce, soft socks, light bulbs, the internet, self cleaning ovens....

22 posted on 08/24/2014 4:19:39 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain; ProgressingAmerica
Progressivism, on the other hand, tends to view the human spirit as intrinsically good. For some progressives, “good” becomes a relative term defined by the individual. The only “bad” is to infringe on another person’s ability to express their own version of “good.”
WHAT a load of horse manure.

From Wikipedia:

Progressivism is a broad political philosophy based on the Idea of Progress, which asserts that advances in science, technology, economic development, and social organization can improve the human condition . . .
I don't see anywhere that humans are intrinsically good. I also see ONE person's definition of "progressivism.”

HORSE puckey.

I wouldn’t suggest taking dictionary, let alone Wikipedia, definitions of political terms too seriously. If you consult Safire’s New Political Dictionary, for instance, you will learn that the meaning of “liberal” was changed - essentially inverted - in the 1920s. And anyone who considers the matter realistically will realize that the term “progressive” has undergone a similar metamorphosis. After all, one of the few powers the Constitution explicitly grants to Congress is
To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries
And yet the modern “progressive” systematically looks for reasons to regress from the use of fossil fuels upon which modern electric power and cars and trucks depend.

23 posted on 08/24/2014 5:01:13 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
I've read the things on "Progressivism" and it's many things to many people. One's ideas of what is progressive might be very personal. One's political party's ideas of what is progressive might differ from mine.

It doesn't really matter WHAT it is.
Medically, it's wonderful to progress. However, we can't live forever. SOMEthing has to end our lives. Perhaps it boils down to quality of life.

Educationally, financially, there are so many way to express ideas about "progress" there.
It's been KIND of an interesting discussion, don't you think? NOTHING will be solved here, as usual, but we do get to express ourselves.

24 posted on 08/24/2014 6:10:15 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Try thriftbooks.com

Mrs. AV


25 posted on 08/24/2014 6:16:50 PM PDT by Atomic Vomit (http://www.cafepress.com/aroostookbeauty/358829)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Atomic Vomit

Many books for 3.99 or less + free shipping always. Used books of course, but they are helping keep the used bookstores in business.


26 posted on 08/24/2014 6:58:31 PM PDT by Atomic Vomit (http://www.cafepress.com/aroostookbeauty/358829)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

There is a reason wikipedia is considered a suspect source in scholarly circles.

The definition it gives of “Progressivism” is the one self-proclaimed “Progressives” (later “liberals”, now “Progressives” again) used to sell their ideas, rather than a dispassionate description of the movement’s views. (Hardly surprising considering the dominant political views of wikipedians.)

If, however, you look at the program of the American left from the time it called itself “Progressive” near the turn of the twentieth century to the present when it is starting to use the name again, having exhausted the benefit they got from stealing the name “liberal”, one of its fundamental premises is the denial of the Fall. Man is either fundamentally good or a tabula rasa. The moral-relativist strain of progressivism favors the former, the more totalitarian sort, the latter.


27 posted on 08/24/2014 9:48:30 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

Actually, there are no other systems of faith which explain the problem or present the solution in the way Christianity does.

Christianity tells us that without God, we are intrinsically evil and lost. Not even potentially good. And that we can’t lift a finger to save ourselves. Nothing we do can help in our salvation, not at all, even to the smallest extent.


28 posted on 08/24/2014 10:24:37 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they believed not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
Thanks for your reply.
Such heresy: Wikipedia not The Final Word? :o)
29 posted on 08/25/2014 5:44:10 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion; cloudmountain; Pelham

This is why I use my blog to bring their history to the surface, to make it easier to find with a simple search.

Progressivism is a specific ideology, but nobody is reading the progressives’ own history, so historical facts get supplanted by modern opinions. When there are no real facts on the table, any topic can be tabula rasa. Look at what the progressives have done to the Founders, first by starting with simply not teaching them anymore.

It does matter what progressivism is, because if there ever came to be enough conservatives who could cite chapter, page, etc., of all the evil things these people have written, today’s progressives would have a very big problem on their hands.


30 posted on 08/30/2014 6:10:00 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (Progressives do not want to discuss their history. I want to discuss their history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
This is why I use my blog to bring their history to the surface, to make it easier to find with a simple search.
Progressivism is a specific ideology, but nobody is reading the progressives’ own history, so historical facts get supplanted by modern opinions. When there are no real facts on the table, any topic can be tabula rasa. Look at what the progressives have done to the Founders, first by starting with simply not teaching them anymore.
It does matter what progressivism is, because if there ever came to be enough conservatives who could cite chapter, page, etc., of all the evil things these people have written, today’s progressives would have a very big problem on their hands.

I hadn't thought of it that way.

31 posted on 08/30/2014 6:45:17 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
I use my blog to bring their history to the surface, to make it easier to find with a simple search.
I certainly appreciate that concept. It shouldn’t be hard to find these things, but you certainly know that “the media” isn’t about to help anyone find the inconvenient truths you are putting together.

32 posted on 08/30/2014 7:04:55 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson