Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: servo1969

“There is no reason this type of armor, which is designed for warfare, should be available in our communities except for those who need it, like law enforcement,”

If the government has it, and doesn’t want us private citizens to have it, then we need it. That’s the basic premise of the 2nd Amendment.


7 posted on 08/22/2014 8:59:12 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

Playing Devil’s Advocate. Wouldn’t that just encourage the further militarization of the Police? If citizens become more and more armed themselves, doesn’t it after awhile start to devolve into a kind a “Arms Race” between Citizens and Police?


20 posted on 08/22/2014 9:16:09 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

“If the government has it, and doesn’t want us private citizens to have it, then we need it. That’s the basic premise of the 2nd Amendment.”

I can not in any way argue with your logic. I can only point out that you are not the first one to say figure this out.

“Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry” -Thomas Jefferson


29 posted on 08/22/2014 9:52:47 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

Absolutely!


30 posted on 08/22/2014 9:56:34 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal (Bible Summary in a few verses: John 14:6, John 6:29, Romans 10:9-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson