To: KingLudd; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; redleghunter; Springfield Reformer; ...
The article lacks any documentation, but that is the writers style. He also denies the
Historicity of Jesus Christ,
contrary to virtually all modern scholars of antiquity, as well as Nazareth (
contra ).
4 posted on
08/19/2014 4:24:54 AM PDT by
daniel1212
(Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
To: daniel1212
I’m not looking for an argument on religion but I am simply following a 2,000-year-old Jewish tradition regarding the origins of Christianity. Only in Israel and India does Jesus go by a Hindi name, Yeshu, which in Egypt was applied to Krishna.
5 posted on
08/19/2014 5:12:20 AM PDT by
idov
To: daniel1212
No credible scholar denies the historicity of Jesus.
May as well deny all history if you deny the life of Jesus because nothing in ancient history is more documented than the life of Jesus Christ.
10 posted on
08/19/2014 7:50:24 AM PDT by
boycott
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson