When exactly did WE decide that the sodomite agenda is "none of our business"? Now, your use of acronyms certainly indicates that YOU have decided this and your other comments on this thread indicate that YOU support this agenda.
Frankly most of the anger toward these books is from puritanical feminists who feel every single woman, even all the fictional ones must behave like their idea of an assertive brash dominant ‘real woman’.
Spoken like a true leftist.
When porno is embraced by so many "Christians" the horse is out of the barn and already way, way, over the hill.
"Soft" porn is just another one of the many popular "Soft" denials of Christ.
somewhere, more than a year ago I saw a comment to
the effect that the real purpose, or one of them of
the Fifty Shades “book” was to promote political
submission; I regret I cannot give credit.
I was speaking in terms of the general population accepting LGBT activism not FR. But I do find it curious that while most here (I think) claim to be okay with gays ‘keeping it to themselves’ they are not quite as tolerant of heterosexual fantasies.
Overall this Fifty Shades thing strikes me as more of a feminist/pc controversy. They hate that a fictional woman dares to want to play a ‘submissive’ role. Introducing the ‘how Christian is it?’ angle is a red herring for whether it deserves special scorn. It isn’t particularly more or less antichristian than typical trashy romance novels nobody cares to think about.