[ilgipper]

If it’s the issue of subsidies, it’s not a typo. The author stated it was intentionally designed that way.

The liberal 'round-about' continues, and their control of the various media outlets allows it to happen...

Initial response...it's a type in the legislation. Clearly that wasn't the intent

A few days later, the renowned architect of the system is shown on tape in 2012 saying the intent is exactly what is in the legislation. The left responds - 'what he says is irrelevant. He didn't write the law.

Round and round we go.

[publius911]

A few days later, the renowned architect of the system is shown on tape in 2012 saying the intent is exactly what is in the legislation. The left responds - 'what he says is irrelevant. He didn't write the law.

Speaking of irrelevant, The House didn't write the law either!

In fact, it has been established beyond any argument whatsoever, that not a single member of the House at the time actually read it before they passed the bill!

Reasonably, discussion and debate must occur before a law is passed.