Posted on 07/21/2014 7:37:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin
Tesla said this week that its $35,000 entry, due in 2017 (or thereabouts), will be called the Model 3. One of the keys to making a cheaper Tesla is battery technology, as CEO Elon Musk pointed out to Auto Express earlier in the week.
I chatted with John Voelcker, senior editor for High Gear Media, which publishes Green Car Reports, in the wake of the news. He offered insight into what impact a lower-priced Tesla might have.
Q: Tesla has sold very pricey cars to date. How might a $35,000 Model 3 shake things up?
John Voelcker: A list price of $35,000 is a very nice place to be as compared to the current Model S, which is selling well for its category, but this is a category that starts at $70,000 and goes up to six figures. So, if Tesla can in fact introduce the Model 3, as it's now called, at a base price of $35,000 with a 200-mile electric range, that will take them into a whole new order of magnitude of volume.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnet.com ...
98%+ of daily driving is less than 50 miles. The people who use the 300 miles as an example of “why” you should never by an electric car are creating a red herring.
Eggsackley. I have a 2008 Hyundai Entourage I bought new and it has only 23,760 miles on it and it is the only vehicle I drive. At less than 4000 miles per year I probably could use an electric, but I would still have to have something to make trips in when I make the rare one.
No doubt. We do take family trips in my wife’s SUV. We never take my Infiniti sedan. We’d all kill each other :-)
You hate to break that to me? Why did you think I identified as the core market such a limited market as purchasers of police cruisers and taxis? Try getting fares riding around in a scooter. Or (CHiPS notwithstanding) bringing someone down to the station. If you use $6,000 a year in gas, you’re not using a scooter; why do you premise your arguments that a scooter always suffices as an alternative to a luxury car? Any vehicle that consumes $6,000 a year in gas (and is not used for freight) can save a lot of money by switching to 110 MPGe.
You seem to suffer from the notion that the alternative to being a Kool-Aid-drinking barking moonbat for one opinion is to be a Kool-Aid-drinking barking moonbat for the opposite position, that no position can ever be qualified.
(Tip: if something “causes” a site to be eligible for becoming a superfund site, it would never be legal in the first place.)
I really should look into the law regarding those little four-wheeler hunting, etc. vehicles. Might be road worthy for my use around my area.
The pro/con of gas vs electric, I leave to the individual - but what I do applaud -- very, sincerely applaud- is the fact that this technology is made in USA. American plants, with American workers, solving a technological problem and taking that solution to the market place.
It's American ingenuity at its very, very best.
Absolutely! Great post. That’s what just kills me about the Tesla responses on FR. I would have expected better but this place has changed over the years.
I get the fact that so many people have an in built bias toward gas cars, and would never, ever (like eating green eggs and ham) think of owning an electric car. But I'm one of those who are interested in new technologies and the problems that Tesla had to solve. So far, as a company, they look pretty impressive to me.
What, you don’t like the sound of a Prius, MmmmmmmmGay!.
Courtesy of Peanut( Jeff Dunham)
I believe one of the things that Tesla had to solve was keeping the batteries at a constant temperature. Saw many videos from Tesla fans who live in cold areas like MN or WI and gave the car glowing reviews in their area.
Tesla, and Musk, is a truly disruptive company/technology. Have you seen the video of their production facility in California? Incredible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_lfxPI5ObM
And I;m the same way. If you want a gas car, fine. Good for you. We have two. But it’s no skin off anyone’s back if you are interested in an electric car. the Tesla is the only one I’m interested in (specs and look). I would never get a Nissan Leaf (fugly) but know several people who have them. People berating Tesla as the equivalent of a Prius (and Prius drivers) are just ignorant.
Here’s part 2 of that video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEReFPI4jSc
For readers who don’t know, cold batteries have less charging capacity. Very cold batteries have much less charging capacity.
That's a bad deal. Expensive gasoline at least gets poor people off the streets and improves congestion so there's some tangible benefit. Expensive electricity hurts everything.
I have a 2010 F150 FX4 crew cab pickup (bought in May of 2010). That’s gives me just over 4 years of ownership.
In 241 fill-ups since owning it, I have spent $17,342.00. I have averaged $3.19 per gallon, and $72.76 per fill-up. I have 82,011 miles on the truck (at last fill-up).
Figure that’s $346.84 per month on gas, roughly, or $4162.08 per year.
how about a corvette z06, viper, Mustang cobra jet???
keep laughing..
“35K is still a “luxury” car”
Guaranteed if RATS are still in charge in DC come 2017, taxpayers will be footing a $5000 plus GuvMint Rebate to get people into the 3 model. Probably add another 2 or 3 grand in Kalifornia.
“(Tip: if something “causes” a site to be eligible for becoming a superfund site, it would never be legal in the first place.)”
Your ignorance is exceeded only by your gullibility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.