Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog

While I imagine that the military does have the right to use expanding ammunition against terrorists and the like since none of that lot have signed any treaties nor even considered abiding by them, it’s probably a logistical concern as much as anything. Sorting out which bullets could be used on which targets would be rather annoying, and it’s easier to just generally stick to the treaty provisions even if you are fighting non signatories.


27 posted on 07/05/2014 1:11:09 PM PDT by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: drbuzzard
Ahhh... How about we just kill the bad guys as expediently as possible? If you can come up with a better and simpler design on the .45 1911 let me know. At that point I would want to invest.
134 posted on 07/06/2014 9:10:34 PM PDT by Desron13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson