That was kinda my question. Did they have to explain to the young lad what sexual misconduct is, or did they just go straight to the signing away of rights...
“Did they have to explain to the young lad what sexual misconduct is,”
_____________________________________________
That reminds me of the famous cartoon of a little boy and little girl looking down each others shorts and saying..”Wow, there really is a difference.” :)
A 5 yr old is not legally able to sign anything. Damn, I hate to say it but they need to sue. These people are unreasonable so suing makes complete sense to me.
At 5, a good case can be made that he can’t READ what he signed, much less understand it.