6/25/2014 6:05:02 AM · 77 of 99
kanawa to ransomnote
Lovely little expression of your wisdom on that thread.
“As I’ve said, having debated pit bull owners/supporters for pages and pages of FR posts, I now realize that death toll is just fine with pit bull owners...They object to any attempt by the public to use laws to reduce the death toll...want the rest of us to shut up and get used to dogs killing and eating babies
I assume you still hold that position?
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View R
________________________________________________
Yes. I don’t always include a qualifier stating that I am focusing on the advocates for these dogs, the ones that basically say “So stats show pits kill more people than all other non-pit breeds combined? Tsk tsk tsk. Bad owners. But any attempt to control the problem is unfair, unAmerican and since no plan to stop the bloodshed is fair, let’s talk about something else, like this picture of my pit licking an infant’s face!”
I’ve been on too many threads where a grisly child fatality is the OP of the thread and the pit advocates show up and post photos of their baby or children playing with pits as if saying “See! My dog hasn’t killed my children yet! That means I am a better owner!” I’ve seen those kinds of posts on many many threads of maulings and killings by pit. The denials and disinterest on the part of pit advocates has convinced me, their ownership means something special to them, the think it’s someone else’s problem, and the gory stats just do.not.count.
You are a pathetic liar.
Let's have the names.
Which Freepers are fine with people getting killed by dogs?
Which Freepers object to any attempt to use laws to reduce the death toll?
Which Freepers want people to get use to dogs killing and eating babies?
Prove it or retract it, worm.