Skip to comments.
Machine Gun-Toting SWAT Team Blindsides Innocent Old Man, PUMMELS Him
Daily Caller ^
| 05/19/2014
| Eric Owens
Posted on 05/19/2014 10:43:02 AM PDT by Rusty0604
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
To: ryan71
I think that you answered your own question, though your words are not quite those I would use.
61
posted on
05/19/2014 1:52:51 PM PDT
by
sport
To: ryan71
I wonder if any of these SWAT members ever ask, [a] “Is this really necessary?” or [b] are they all punks? The answer is => [b]
62
posted on
05/19/2014 2:10:29 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: ryan71
They were pissed because he didn’t have the required sacrificial dog handy.
63
posted on
05/19/2014 2:20:55 PM PDT
by
X-spurt
(CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
The lawsuit also alleges that the SWAT team positioned a sniper across the street to monitor the situation in case the quinquagenarian man with a degenerative disorder of the central nervous system tried anything squirrely.
Libertarian ping! Click
here to get added or
here to be removed or post a message here!
64
posted on
05/19/2014 2:44:39 PM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: bamahead
Well, the one guy was gay and the other just wanted to help people.
Now, you deal with roid heads on power trips.
65
posted on
05/19/2014 4:24:56 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: Rusty0604
A problem with a conservative solution....
DEFUND the POLICE.
66
posted on
05/19/2014 5:21:06 PM PDT
by
RKBA Democrat
(Two parties, one agenda. It's the uniparty.)
To: Rusty0604
As pointed out frequently here on FR, they need to go home safely and keep their pensions. Eventually, that's not going to help them either.
67
posted on
05/19/2014 8:30:33 PM PDT
by
zeugma
(Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Dr. Seuss)
To: stevie_d_64
It’s not fear. It’s conditioning.
They want the public to justify anything they do, for any “reason”
Calling it fear gives them an excuse for engaging in conditioning. (”see, the public agrees that Mundanes should/should not......”)
68
posted on
05/21/2014 10:53:28 AM PDT
by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: Louis Foxwell
"Right. At 73 I only occasionally refer to myself as old. At 80 I am sure I will fit the category. Just give me a few more years. I am sure old will catch up to me." Right. At 73 80 I only occasionally refer to myself as old. At 80 90 I am not sure I will fit the category. Just give me a few more 25-more years. I am sure old will catch up to me.
69
posted on
05/21/2014 2:12:23 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: SuperLuminal
70
posted on
05/21/2014 2:55:47 PM PDT
by
Louis Foxwell
(This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
To: bamahead
In answer to your picture comparison...
in a word, “Ratings”...
71
posted on
05/22/2014 2:28:18 PM PDT
by
stevie_d_64
(It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson