Real scientists would demand to know the physics of how increased CO2 in the atmosphere causes global warming.
“Why would anyone risk his career on something that wasn’t true?
Get your thinking caps for that one.
I had a discussion with agricultural phd candidates and explained that lack of c02 was a growth limiting factor. The implication is that c02 levels are self regulating and will absorp excess c02 for those with thinking caps. Plants are starved for c02. For example we pump c02 into green houses to stimulate growth.
Their response to this information? “I wouldn’t want to be in that green house.”
“Real scientists would demand to know the physics of how increased CO2 in the atmosphere causes global warming.”
Although I fancy myself a scientist, by inclination and to some degree by education, this is the basic question that has not yet been addressed, much less answered satisfactorily, in this matter of the capacity of carbon dioxide to induce significant warming of Earth’s atmosphere. I’ve been waiting, and waiting, for someone to address this question, substantively.
Meanwhile, if he's in a building, the internal CO2 level is probably 1,000 ppm or higher, as compared to 400 ppm outside.