Skip to comments.
Married lesbian ‘throuple’ expecting first child
NY Post ^
| April 23, 2014
| By David K. Li
Posted on 04/23/2014 1:55:23 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Gee, who didn't see this coming. BTW: "Throuple"...Is that pronounced 'Throw up - ple' ??
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Attention whores.
2
posted on
04/23/2014 1:56:42 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The best way to control opposition is to lead it ourselves." -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
But, none of this is legal. At least not yet.
Liberals used to laugh at anybody who thought homosexual marriage would pave the way for polygamy or group marriage. A three way such as these could well be a test case for blasting away monogamy, regardless of the sexes of any of the partners.
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
So, let me get this straight (no pun intended)—not only does Massachusetts let same sexes marry, they also allow multiple spouses?
4
posted on
04/23/2014 1:59:31 PM PDT
by
DallasDeb
(usafa06mom)
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
So in Mass. it is now legal for people to be involved in bigamy????
5
posted on
04/23/2014 1:59:38 PM PDT
by
Nifster
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Is it me or do they look a tad too mannish there?
6
posted on
04/23/2014 1:59:43 PM PDT
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Bundy ranch "Domestic terrorists" - Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan "work place violence".)
Why shouldn’t it be legal, if you follow the logic that has been introduced to the equation?
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
The Three Stooges in Drag were more convincing.
8
posted on
04/23/2014 2:00:56 PM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
WOW, those are some DUDES. At least 2 of the 3 are. Not sure which 2...
To: massgopguy
The one in the middle might be a real female.
10
posted on
04/23/2014 2:01:46 PM PDT
by
tioga
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
11
posted on
04/23/2014 2:02:42 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
Polygamy is a lot closer to normality than homosexuality. Among my Native American ancestors, it was a common way to ensure that surplus women were cared for since the mortality rate for men was much higher.
How ironic is it really that homo threesomes and more are the first to demand official recognition?
12
posted on
04/23/2014 2:03:39 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Dilbert San Diego
The same rationale for gay “marriage” applies to groupings of any number of people: they “love each other.”
States that have approved gay “marriage” must now explain why a marriage is only 2 people. It isn’t based in any rationale (such as procreation) so it is based on... nothing.
If someone wants to marry their sibling or parent the State has zero counter argument.
13
posted on
04/23/2014 2:04:15 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
I’m only surprised that I am surprised. On a good day, this may seem very nice, but on a difficult day, Hmmm. May border on child abuse. Can you imagine the petty quabbling, mean-girling, “borrowed” sweater ripping, emotional bullying and outright BOSSY behavior? Why, it’s ALMOST enough to drive a group marriage woman into a straight, two party marriage like her grandparents.
To: massgopguy
Hey, you're right! LOL!
Hellooo helloooo...HELLO!! Wooo wooo woo woooo! Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk!
15
posted on
04/23/2014 2:06:32 PM PDT
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Bundy ranch "Domestic terrorists" - Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan "work place violence".)
To: lee martell
Here’s an idea, let’s all 300+ million of us get married! We could pay a family plan premium on our ObamaCare.
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Oh please...Laz would be hitting these,(well, I’m not sure just what to call them) ladies so hard that when he woke up he would believe that Al Gore had won the election.
17
posted on
04/23/2014 2:07:00 PM PDT
by
Delta Dawn
(Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
It’s a dog-eat-dog world out there...and getting worse by the day!
18
posted on
04/23/2014 2:09:10 PM PDT
by
broken_arrow1
(I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
19
posted on
04/23/2014 2:09:23 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Why are all the articles calling them “married”? They’re not married. They put on white dresses and went through a ceremony, but three women marrying is not legal.
And all three dads walked them down the aisle? There wasn’t one dad who objected to this?
20
posted on
04/23/2014 2:10:56 PM PDT
by
Nea Wood
(When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination.-Sowell)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson