Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Be Free

OK now I get it. It’s just like how much I have to pay the bank to transfer funds to another institution never went down because there were no high speed bankers to raise the volume. Oh, wait a minute, it did go down.

Or maybe it’s like how the cost of tv’s never came down because there was no one to electronically trade them a million times before they get to the customer. Oops that’s not it either.

Oh, well you must be right, the cost of trading technology would never have come down for the first time in the history of any endeavor involving technology. Thank God for those HFT guys. Is there someplace I can send them a card or maybe a gift?


29 posted on 04/04/2014 1:20:08 PM PDT by Go_Raiders (Freedom doesn't give you the right to take from others, no matter how innocent your program sounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Go_Raiders

I did not mean to say costs would not have come down. I did mean to say costs would not have come down as much. There was a club, if not cabal, of Wall St. firms that actively acted against electronic trading, ECN’s, ATS’s, and HFT’s - not because they were bad, but because their protected profits from market-making and high commission rates were threatened.

Without these advancements, specifically including the HFT’s and the brokers that embraced them, it’s a fact fully-loaded costs of trade and settlement would not have come down as much as they have.

People complain (as witnessed in this CNBC clip) about the billions that HFT’s make, but say not a word about the 10’s or 100’s of billions saved because of lower aggregate trading costs.

The fact remains that, whatever small cost per-share or trade is resultant from the “friction” of trading (embedded costs), long-term investors should view this as largely irrelevant to their potential or actual investment returns. Don’t believe me - do the math. What does 1/10-cent of incremental cost do to your investment return on stock you buy and hold for 5-years before selling? We’re talking 100ths of a percentage point.

Now if you’re a trader, not an investor, and trying to out-gun a HFT from your e-Trade account while sitting in your home-office, then good luck to you. You’re fighting a nuke with a water-pistol. But then again, individual traders trying to beat the Wall St. pros has never been a reliable avocation.


30 posted on 04/05/2014 7:37:35 AM PDT by Be Free (I believe in gun control. The more people that control their own guns, the safer we'll all be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson