[cousteausghost]

Rubbish - your analysis was torn to shreds to the point that every non-committed reader of the thread could see your errors and that the planes were the same. Your absolute commitment to this theory prevents you seeing what’s obvious.

Now, explain again why they didn’t just give fake a heart attack at her home?

[OneWingedShark]

Now, explain again why they didn’t just give fake a heart attack at her home?

Having public people who are [a] involved (e.g. Fuddy) or [b] investigating (e.g Breitbart) conspiracy/corruption all dieing of sudden and unexpected heart-attacks would go a long way to tickling the "tin-foil hat reflex" and essentially draw attention to the people that they're trying to silence (meaning there'd be more chances for the info they were killed over to get out).

[holden]

So many of your posts have the same, tired pattern of asking a question that it's clearly not BDZ or anyone else's responsibility to answer. You should simply stop. Furthermore, it's clear from your writing that your repeated intent is to try to smear her character, research and intellect. Although she might not be perfect, she's proved herself again and again around here that she bring a lot of good and usefulness to the table, not least of which is her moral, well-intentioned, conservative approach to things.

She's no more beholden to you than you are to yourself about other ways Fuddy could have been killed. Your calling attention to other manner of mayhem for which there is little or no evidence serves only to confuse the issues, but that, too, is apparently your intent.

Your aforementioned behavior characteristics don't mesh with conservatives, for whom this website was intended. So I suggest you find a place more to your way of thinking and behaving. DU, perhaps.

HF

[Brown Deer]

Now, explain again why they didn’t just give fake a heart attack at her home?

Why on earth should anyone answer your juvenile questions - who put you in charge? You add nothing to any discussion except your aggression.