Posted on 03/31/2014 10:55:40 AM PDT by ethical
She's no more beholden to you than you are to yourself about other ways Fuddy could have been killed. Your calling attention to other manner of mayhem for which there is little or no evidence serves only to confuse the issues, but that, too, is apparently your intent.
Your aforementioned behavior characteristics don't mesh with conservatives, for whom this website was intended. So I suggest you find a place more to your way of thinking and behaving. DU, perhaps.
HF
The idea of over-population is an old one, goes back to a fellow named Malthus who wrote in the late 17 hundreds, it’s been picked up by a number of authors over the centuries, it suits the control-freaks, each one of whom would choose others to be annihilated, and they themselves would live. (With huge yatchts, homes that suck up more power than a whole town, and their very own Airforce One to get around the world in.)
In the old USSR that type had their own department stores, their own dachas, special schools, access to the best food of course, while millions starved and died in the Gulag system.
I still have it in my mind that it might be too simple to assume just one person was the target, if there was a target. If there was any tampering with the aircraft before it left the island, perhaps they were all meant to go to a watery grave. As a sidenote there were two people on board who were never identified. Two people who may have wanted to remain anonymous and requested their identity remain concealed, thus the pixilation of the film. Too many unknowns. A plot to eliminate the director of health wouldn’t stop just there.
First off, how do you know why Taitz’ request has not been fulfilled?Because if you go look at her website and look at her requests, she contacted the Maui Police Department and sent a request to the Medical Examiner. And in the comments, Taitz pointed out that she didn't bother to pay. And the Maui Police Department blew her off because she wasn't a relative or had a relative's written permission, as they are supposed to do by their own regulations. And then she began badgering the reporter to give her the report...which would be blatantly illegal in any state of the union and would result in the reporter facing jail time.
I posted here at FR some of the observations indicating that the “video” sequence in the KITV funeral report was photoshopped.Are these observations or is it proof? Put plainly, would your proof satisfy a court of law?
Your suggestion that the evidence be a direct confession from the person who did the edit tells me that you’re a troll.Nope, not a troll. You have observations, hints, suppositions, circumstantials - I want proof. Ironclad proof. The type that holds up in court.
The coroner is supposed to have the real skinny from the first-person sources. The report from the people who found Fuddy. Why would he say, the next day, that Fuddy’s body had been retrieved from the wreckage?I repeat, the news had not been gathered at that point. All data had not been collated. It doesn't occur instantly.
Andrew Breitbart died around midnight, and by news time the next morning the coroner reported the fact that Breitbart hadn’t seen a doctor within the past year. Why did he report that?
We’re talking about the eyewitness testimony at its freshest point. That’s what the coroner was supposed to have. Why did he say that her body was retrieved from the wreckage?Because he's operating off of eyewitness testimony, the most unreliable testimony that ever existed. Never trust eyewitness testimony. It's crap. Guy should have waited till he got the videos and the black box and so on.
Cousteau claimed he’s a neighbor of a member here who asked him to bring his expertise to another thread on the same topic.
Needless to say, he’s obviously using a second screen name here or perhaps a retread. IMHO of course.
Butterdezillion has said many times that she puts her theories out for FReepers to comment on and to find flaws with them if there are any. Cousteau's comments do precisely that, IMHO.
Your aforementioned behavior characteristics don't mesh with conservatives, for whom this website was intended. So I suggest you find a place more to your way of thinking and behaving. DU, perhaps.
Who died and put you in charge of Free Republic? JimRob knows how to zot people who need zotting.
Holden may not be in charge but he makes good sense.
You said: “Guy should have waited till he got the videos and the black box and so on.”
Now THAT is irony, considering I’ve got the video and the official reports written after all the information was compiled, and that’s what is revealing the anomalies.
Also, there is no black box. Aircraft operating under this operating certificate do not have black boxes. Only commercial flights carrying 19 passengers or more are required to have black boxes.
is unlikely, there are easier ways, but we live in Interesting Times, and an 'accident' that may have been designed to eliminate one person by eliminating them all, isn't bizarre, when you take into account the 25 million Americans the 'revolutionaries' connected to your home-grown terrorist, were prepared to 'eliminate' ...
using divers, just comes off as to Hollywood.
...the images were too unclear to see what was going on, but I'm of a mind that if the aircraft was tampered with on the island before take-off, the other passengers and the pilot's fate would have been of no concern, just hope they all drown. Where did the original weak signal come from that the pilot Lang was asked to check out? Someone must have contacted the Molikai tower. Lang didn't find that aircraft by accident. Leaving them all in the water overnight until a search could be conducted at dawn might have had a totally different outcome, if the 'swimmer' hadn't made it to shore.
Of course you have to remember who we are dealing with.
I never lose sight of that. That's the entire problem. Lies. Anything to do with this issue is tainted by the lies.
Then there is the matter of diagnosing the ABC acquired film from the passenger with the go pro—an entirely different matter.
Depends on who got their hands on it first. Wouldn't the authorities have been within their rights to confiscate the film and any stills, for the purpose of an investigation? How did the ABC get hold of it? Who were the two 'tourist' passengers who were never identified? Did they perhaps ask for their identity to be kept private, and might that be why the film was pixilated?
Any way you cut it its bizarre.
It's Hawaii. I've reached the conclusion that there are a majority in Hawaii who don't play by the rules because they don't see themselves as Americans. They are thumbing their nose at you, and finally, if Fuddy hadn't been on that aircraft, would the event itself have been of interest? I was amazed when I looked at Google and found how many Cessna crash/belly land all the time.
The FAA says there was no ELT emitting, and there was no mayday call.
The stories of how the crash was discovered are all fabricated, just like the close-up plane in Lang’s photo.
Did Buddy Richardson exist?
___________________________
You got me. There’s probably somebody in the world by that name, but I never heard of him. Or is it a dog named Buddy?
As usual you make really good cogent observations Fred. For me there is a lot of conjecture and once again I am unable to do the due diligence of analyzing film or interviewing whomever possible in Hawaii. Someone needs to be doing just that.Thanks for a better look.
I wondered about that...where did that message come from? Who heard the weak signal, who sent the weak signal? The best I can recommend is what I myself apply, the waiting technique. You save it, you set it aside, and out of the blue, you can bet another piece of the puzzle appears. Because it’s impossible to hide everything, forever. You would be surprised to see how well that works.
‘Does Richard Ndesandjo exist?’
Do most genealogy services list Richard?
Has Mark Ndesandjo posted photos of Richard, and IDed them as his brother?
Has Mark promised to devote an entire section of his upcoming book to his relationship with Richard, as he has to his relationship with his late brother, David?
Has Nairobi’s largest newspaper mentioned Richard as being Ruth Ndesandjo’s son, as it has David?
Has Nairobi’s second largest newspaper mentioned Richard as Ruth Ndesandjo’s son, as it has David?
When Sally Jacobs interviewed the Ndesandjos’ neighbors, did they mention Richard? They mentioned Mark and David.
Did David Maraniss mention Richard as being a son of Ruth Ndesandjo, as he mentioned Mark and David?
I gather that Richard’s entire existence is based on one quote by Ruth Ndesandjo. I’ve never seen the quote in context and I don’t know how reliable it is. If, however, she had a son named Richard, wouldn’t you think he’d left behind a bit more of a trail, a la David Ndesandjo?
_______________________________________
I don’t know the answers to your questions, but I can answer my own. It seems that Richard does exist and Mark claims him as his brother: Richard attended Cornell University. He’s a well-known tennis player. See this link, which was posted somewhere earlier on Free Republic: http://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/1453192/other-obama
Look at this photo, contained within the photo gallery at the top of the article: http://www.scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/980w/public/2014/03/21/mark_obama_-_family_treea.jpg?itok=COHx3_Z0
In his new book, Mark has promised a section about his family tree. That’s his tree in the photo. It includes someone we can presume is Richard, although the name is spelled “Ridhard”.
Josh Lang - whose close-up plane photo is photoshopped - has been a stunt pilot for Hollywood, flies on contract for the US government, and has friends in high places including the guy who oversees DOS security and Erin Billings, the gal who headed up the Podesta Group’s handling of Obama’s 2008 campaign.
And his story of how the crash was spotted only passes muster if the Honolulu Control Facility immediately (as soon as the crash happened) manufactured stories of an ELT transmitting and told the Molokai tower operator and the USCG that.
Thanks for posting the link to the family tree. I wonder why ‘Ridhard’ is mentioned nowhere else? [Other than the quote from Ruth I mentioned before...which pointedly omits Joseph.]
All I can say is that Mark’s book will be interesting. I am very curious as to what he will say about Richard/Ridhard.
It would seem the perps are all above water. Let the truth rise to the surface as it is inclined to do...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
