So the U.S. documented killings which reveal that pits kill more people than all other breeds combined, and the report by a trauma physician proving that for his hospital system pitbulls cost more in rehab mauligns than other breeds should be set aside because you found an article about malamutes killing a child? No one has said that no other dog breed is capable of mauling or killing - it’s the overwhelming videotaped and documented (medically, insurance costs, etc.) proof that pitbulls kill too often and maul to an umbelievable degree compared with all other dog breeds...combined.
No, documented killings should not be set aside,
they should be studied, analysed, contributing factors extracted
and used to educate people in safe, responsible dog ownership.
Your hysterical hyperbole could well be set aside though.
Perhaps you could read again what I did post
rather than expend energy putting words in my mouth.
“kill too often”
ONE death by any dog is one too many.