Posted on 03/03/2014 9:04:41 PM PST by Olog-hai
Doesn’t Van Jones look so cute in his tight-fitting Mao suit and ballet slippers.
Now even Obamie’s commies are getting their knickers tighted up in a wad, or was he like that naturally?
CNN is becoming so desperate the next thing you know, they’ll have Whitey Bulger on covering the crime beat, Anita Dunn doing a rehash of the “Cultural Revolution’s upcoming 50th anniversary, and Rahm Emanuel doing a pirorette in “Swan Lake” for some elementary school kids.
Doesn’t Van Jones look so cute in his tight-fitting Mao suit and ballet slippers.
Now even Obamie’s commies are getting their knickers tighted up in a wad, or was he like that naturally?
CNN is becoming so desperate the next thing you know, they’ll have Whitey Bulger on covering the crime beat, Anita Dunn doing a rehash of the “Cultural Revolution’s upcoming 50th anniversary, and Rahm Emanuel doing a pirorette in “Swan Lake” for some elementary school kids.
The social issues are more adaptable to the Alinsky method. They will use it to paint their opponents with political tar and feathers. We can do it right back to them. It means getting down into the sewer and fighting them. No hold barred.
We need to distinguish between man’s laws and God’s laws. Neither the Supreme Court nor the US Constitution is going to protect Christians from the world. Far too many Christians have made the mistake of thinking that because they live in America that the laws of the state would be a reflection of the laws of God. As you can see, they aren’t. We Christians have to accept the fact that we are IN the world, and we are not going escape all the evils and temptation from living in the world. We are IN the world, but we do no have to be OF the world. A time of great suffering is coming for all those that follow the Cross of Christ.
Maybe Van needs to have a chat-up with fellow commie traveler
and world reknown homophobe Vlad Putin
Everywhere you turn there’s a “No Gay” sign...oh, wait.
“Guess what. I support the hair-stylist’s right to stop serving...for whatever reason. It may not be good for business, but that’s his/her right.”
That reminds me of an incident my Dad told me about. During the civil rights era and afterwards, my Dad was a barber. He said blacks would go around testing different businesses to see if they would be served. One day a black guy came in his barber shop, sat down in the chair and asked for a hair cut. My Dad cheerfully said, ‘Why sure.’ ‘I’ve never cut a black person’s hair before but I’ll be glad to give it a try.’ The guy got up and left.
What does Mr. Van have to say to the gay hairdresser who is now refusing the governor of Arizona service?
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3128921/posts
Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex marriage
nydailynews.com ^ | 03/03/2014 | RHEANA MURRAY
FU commie!
The reason why the left hates the US Constitution so much is because it is a reflection of the Ten Commandments to a great deal. That’s the way the Founding Fathers set it up.
(photo from Barney's Beanery, a popular bar among West Coast artists and writers)
There are still gay-only bars. And they make special effort to humiliate any outsiders (one in Houston famously made any guy entering surrender his underwear).
The double-standard exists.
That's an easy one.
Burning a cross is not protected speech.
But getting taxpayers to pay a homo to dip it in a jar of urine IS.
And burning an American flag IS.
Leftists like Jones thrive on straw-man arguments. And the ignoramuses amongst the voting public buy into it.
Yes, exactly. How shall we order a society where we must not allow government to have the power to intrude on private matters between consenting adults? I don’t want to have a government that is so powerful that it can decide that what my wife and I do in the privacy of our own home is somehow a “crime”.
Having said that, there is a difference between what behavior government declares to be illegal and what God does. How do we, as a nation where we forbid government from expressing an opinion about religion (via the First Amendment), and requiring it to allow any religious expression or none at all, how do we engender a society that is moral, including one that is moral with respect to sexual behavior?
Christian churches and their clergy used to have a loud voice in the public square and in the public mind. But not only have they been shouted out of the public square, some have been so seduced by the spirit of this world that they even support and enable sexual immorality.
Long ago, state and local governments stopped enforcing laws about co-habitation with a member of the opposite sex. Government in the last several generations has not sanctioned groups of people peacefully living together. If government cannot muster the ability to forbid a “hippie commune” and the resulting feral children, how can it forbid same-sex co-habitation, polygamy or polyamory?
(I am amused at how advocates of same-sex marriage are repulsed by the suggesting that it will lead to legalizing polygamy.)
God is not mocked. At some point He judges a society and first withdraws His blessings and then imposes punishment for immorality. He promises such. But that is a message for those who know and love God to bring to society, not government. And I don’t want to give Catholics or Baptists, or Muslims, the power of arrest, jail and deadly force, to impose what they see as moral on me.
Now, how to have a peaceful moral and godly society? Sometimes you can’t. In Luke 4:29 an entire city ejected Jesus an attempted to murder him for being truthful with them about their attitude towards God’s truth.
Leviticus 18:22-30 MKJV
(22) You shall not lie with mankind as with womankind. It is abomination to God.
(23) And you shall not lie with any animal to defile yourself with it. And a woman shall not stand before an animal to lie down to it. It is a perversion.
(24) Do not defile yourselves in any of these things. For in all these the nations are defiled, which I cast out before you.
(25) And the land is defiled. Therefore I visit its wickedness on it, and the land itself vomits out those who live in it.
(26) You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations, neither the native, nor any stranger that lives among you.
(27) For the men of the land who were before you have done all these abominations, and the land is defiled.
(28) You shall not do these so that the land may not spew you out also when you defile it, as it spewed out the nations that were before you.
(29) For whoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls who commit them shall be cut off from among their people.
(30) And you shall keep My ordinance, so as not to do any of these abominable customs which were committed before you, and that you do not defile yourselves in them. I am Jehovah your God.
There was a time I didn’t care one way or the other. Still don’t, in some cases.
But I’m so tired of the “In Your Face Faggots” that I would seriously consider a “No Homosexuals” sign. I might not do it because it would also offend a lot of straights, but I’m tired of being told homosexuals are special people that I must admire.
It seems to me that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is good advice for public behavior, homosexual or heterosexual...just leave your sex life in your bedroom!
So a guy walks into a restaurant and asks the bartender “Do you serve queers here?”
The bartender answers “I’m new here; I’ll have to check the menu!” < /rimshot >
a communist supporting an attack on the family nucleus.
a rainbow flag is the same as saying to normal/straight people allowed. There are no lawsuits of housing consent decrees regarding that form of segragation.
a pink hooded robe is still an evil hooded robe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.