Posted on 03/01/2014 7:11:00 PM PST by SeekAndFind
No, what was released last night was merely an abridged, santized version of what was already shown on cable. And the cable TV show was blander than stale matzah.
Oddly, the sequel was far, far better.
btw, i do like Vertigo--however, best pic? i do not think so... it is not even one of my favorite Hitchcock movies, and i am partial to it because of its being located in the Bay Area...
Preston Sturges REALLY displayed his”Depth”with”Sullivan’s Travels”!!!
2001: A Space Odyssey was a good book, but the movie was boring beyond words and didn’t make any sense unless you had read the book.
Yes that reality that Jesus was whipped, crowned with thorns, and nailed to a cross probably could get in the way of your fantasy world of what Christ went through so that you can have a chance at Heaven. My wife and I loved the movie so much. I am shocked by your criticism of it being uneducated, it was absolutely educational. And to complain that Jesus was tortured. I definitely think you should stay far away from the Passion of Christ because you will have a heart attack seeing what Jesus went through on that one.
You know what? You make me furious. What liberally white-washed TV show being released as a movie? Give me facts instead of nonsense.
Actually, it was FALSE accusations about the film's "anti-Semitism" that kept it from being nominated.
One, Two, Three is a great overlooked movie.
And, like Sullivan’s Travels has a non-Lefty message.
I have a very amusing memory of seeing this movie on late night TV, with commercial interruptions but still with a voice over introducer.
After one commercial he announced: Now we return to our feature: “Eins, Zwei, Drei”
2001 was not a well made movie. Interesting from a “cult” type movie perspective but certainly not Best Picture material.
And now for an opposing point of view...
2001 came out in 1968; I was in eighth grade and living in Japan. Over the next year, I went to see the movie at least 14 times, including losing the chance at a girl friend over it (I took her to the movie, then spent the remainder of the date trying to explain the movie, and that was our last date). To steal an old 7-UP ad line, 2001 was the un-movie, which is one reason why, when 2010 was made a generation later, it was much more of the traditional plot and archetypal characters that movie audiences have learned to expect. I will occasionally watch it now, but more for nostalgia than fascination, since so much of the techniques and technology in the movie is outdated.
I can’t believe that The Great Escape (1963) couldn’t win an award, especially with the performances of Steve McQueen, James Garner, and Richard Attenborough in that film.
If I remember correctly, the book was actually written after the movie was shot.
They are nuts. Tom Jones is still one of the most spectacular films ever made. It made Albert Finney and instant star in his tour-de-force.
Except "what Jesus went through" in The Passion was NOT in the Gospel, but taken from the writings of Sister Anne Emmerich and Mary of Agreda. I still loved the film, but it is not strictly based on Scripture.
Speaking of Finney, he should have won an Oscar for "The Gathering Storm." He WAS Churchill.
A.I.? If there was an award for most ponderous third act it should win by a landslide, otherwise no.
"Agreed, "2001" was awful, except it had some good photography and music.
I can say that Special FX aren’t all that great alone by themselves. Fitting the FX into the story is the big key. Great Escape, despite being from back in 1963, is entertaining from the fact that you can see real stuntmen doing their thing, and not CG imitations of the person.
Clash of the Titans (the original) is immensely entertaining for how well Harryhausen pushed at doing claymation in the Krakken and the other mythological monsters. How they played with the lighting on Medusa in the original made her scary enough I was glad she was fake, otherwise, my bladder would empty real fast.
I would say, however, that it actually took the novel for me to appreciate the film 2001. Mostly because the novel allowed me to have somewhat of a background understanding of what was going on.
I always thought the book came first, but it didn’t.
Interesting article about it here at wikipedia.
2001: A Space Odyssey (film)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_%28film%29
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.