Posted on 02/28/2014 10:07:26 AM PST by Altariel
In a video posted Thursday to YouTube, Connecticut State Police Spokesman Lt. Paul Vance is heard telling a woman identified as "GMN Producer Guerilla Girl Ashley" that she sounded anti-American for questioning the state's new gun control law.
***** "I want to know, if it comes down to it, will the police go to my home if my husband refuses to give up a weapon that was formerly legal and now has been made illegal by a corrupt legislature?" she asked. "Will the police actually go to my home and threaten my family, 'cause I'm scared to death?"
"We don't threaten people, ma'am," Lt. Vance said. "That doesn't happen."
"If you're going with the force of government, that's a threat," she responded.
"Ma'am, it sounds like you're anti-American, it sounds like you're anti-law. I can't answer your question," Lt. Vance remarked.
Ashley told Lt. Vance in no uncertain terms she is pro-American and took exception to being called anti-American, a charge Lt. Vance tried to walk back.
He also told Ashley she should contact an attorney to learn what her options are under the law.
Later, after Ashley said Lt. Vance works for the people of the state, he informed her that he, in fact, is her master.
"You're the servant, we're the master," she said.
"I'm the master, ma'am. I'm the master," he said in response.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Fair enough, it could happen. Your previous post sounded like it was some foregone conclusion, and that’s what I don’t agree with. The left will try, sure, but they try a lot of things and end up failing or getting stopped. We shouldn’t give them more credit than they are due.
There’s no expiration date on a valid illustration.
Okay, I listened. And to be perfectly honest, the girl sounded like an idiot bent on drawing this guy into saying something like his last response.
First of all, this was a planned call to get a response on tape. Whether she has a husband and that husband has an “assault” rifle and a newly banned clip, there’s probably reason for some doubt. She didn’t get hit with any surprise answer, she was begging him to say something like that. She was getting frustrated that she couldn’t get him to bite so she kept pressing. You can hear it in her voice. The pressure was on, she was grasping at straws and she looks like a kook (in any sense, left or right). AND... quite frankly, it sounded to me like his response was filled with sarcasm born out of the frustration of having to deal with the antagonizing insufferable b.i.itch.
His responses were legit to all her questions. He doesn’t make the law, he is paid to enforce the law. If she has a problem with the law, she needs to take it up with the legislature. I’m not coming to kick in your doors, etc... He was trying to get her off the phone and she wouldn’t give up so he finally says yeah, right, whatever, okay lady, I’m the master, whatever you say, have a nice day...
I support of the 2nd Amendment and am equally concerned with the state of affairs regarding disarming law-abiding citizens. But this failed attempted sneak attack does more harm to the cause than good.
On second thought, I won’t even bother with you...
Cheers...
The woman is not responsible for his responses.
He is responsible for his responses.
He is not a victim. Owr his own views, he is her “master”.
Owr = per
not by Connecticut law.
Sez who?
There was a case just a few years ago where a SWAT team raided a house in Fairfield or Easton under the false pretext that someone in the house had "a gun", shot and killed an unarmed man, and the essence of the Chief State's Attorney's report that said "no harm, no foul" was essentially that.
You were right the first time.
Obama: If you like your dog, you can keep your dog.
I read a very good article on Sandy Hook titled Sandy Hook Evidence:Where is the Blood?
(dead-link, reason unknown; archived version here).
What is very striking, even ignoring the well-written article, is that it shows pictures from the Aurora theater-shooting, with blood trails everywhere, and contrasts them with Sandy Hook, which is perfectly clean.
| Aurora | Sandy Hook |
|---|---|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Ping to post 71 if you haven’t already seen it. (re: Sandy Hook)
Indeed; this brochure I made a while back seems to be becoming more and more prophetic.
Here is a brochure detailing how you should interact with your local law-enforcement, made available by myself as a public-service:
Stop, Drop, and Cower
[Direct Link]
Those are certainly some of the possibilities.
May God have mercy on us all.
What a b@st@rd. I hope someone slaps that stupid F’n hat off your head you prick.
Folks up in CT., keep your guns and don’t give’em up, don’t register them and don’t comply.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.