Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Qwackertoo

Not much of a hockey expert but it seemed we lacked a bit on the offensive end (perhaps that’s why we had the same guy take no many shootout shots vs. Russia)on this team. As for the Canada it was perhaps the most lopsided 1-0 game I ever saw. In the 3rd period they never gave one the impression they were going to tie the game. I did not see this mornings game but was not surprised at the lose.


10 posted on 02/22/2014 12:24:22 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: fkabuckeyesrule
There was no good reason for the U.S. to be "lacking" on the offensive end. The roster was filled with players who are among the best offensive stars in the NHL.

The biggest criticism against the U.S. should be brought on their coaching staff, more than anything else. For those Freepers who aren't hockey fans, hockey has an interesting rule that gives a subtle advantage to the home team in a game. It's called the "last change" rule, and it works like this: Before every faceoff after a stop in play, the coach of the visiting team sends his players out onto the ice. The referee then raises his hand to indicate that the visiting team cannot change any players at that point, and the home team then has the option of changing their own players based on who is on the ice for the opposing team.

The implication of this is that the home coach should always be looking to match his lines up in a way that works to his advantage. If the visiting team puts their best offensive players on the ice, the coach of the home team will try to respond by putting his best defensive players out there. The reverse is also true: when the visiting team puts their best defensive players out on the ice, the home coach will try to keep his best offensive players on the bench until he can get a more favorable matchup.

Obviously, this strategy only applies after whistles when the play stops, and all bets are off once teams start "changing on the fly" while the puck is still in play.

When the U.S. played Canada yesterday, the U.S. was the "home" team. And yet U.S. coach Dan Bylsma never tried to use this line-matching strategy to keep the top U.S. offensive line away from the Toews-Marleau-Carter line that played so well defensively for Canada.

14 posted on 02/22/2014 1:27:09 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: fkabuckeyesrule

They seemed very dejected after yesterdays loss. With both the USA Women & Canada and with the USA Men in Canada yesterday they just couldn’t get it in the net . . . it was like some invisible shield/force was keeping the puck out and THEN today . . . it was hard to watch.


16 posted on 02/22/2014 2:43:18 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Going into Politic Free Zone Momma Grizzly hibernation for a while after this week, maybe forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson