Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl

Thanks. I gather it makes sense that Shannon’s model hasn’t made it into the colloquial because people were successfully sending information over electrical wires for a hundred years before he came along. The term had meaning long before he decided its meaning should be more precise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegraph

Cooke and Wheatstone had their first commercial success with a telegraph installed on the Great Western Railway over the 13 miles (21 km) from Paddington station to West Drayton in 1838. Indeed, this was the first commercial telegraph in the world.


231 posted on 02/26/2014 9:28:13 AM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo; betty boop; TXnMA
Irrelevant.

People dealt with gravity and motion long before Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica and Einstein's Relativity - and people were communicating long before Shannon's Mathematical Theory of Communications.

When we use terms such as gravity and motion the terms retain the meanings assigned by Newton and Einstein's seminal theories. Likewise, I assert that the term information should retain the meaning from Shannon's seminal theory which gave rise to "Information Theory" as a branch of Mathematics.

By the way, Shannon's definition much more closely aligns to the original late 14th century meaning of the word which was the "act of informing." Modern common usage reduces it to the message itself rather than the successful communication of the message.

237 posted on 02/26/2014 8:29:29 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson