we already have proof it isn’t genetic (ie hard-coded).
Identical twin studies have shown when one is gay, the other is only gay about 50% of the time.
If it was hardcoded and immutable, unchangeable, the second twin would have to be gay 100% of the time.
The fact it isn’t shows there is no hardcoding that people simply cannot help but be gay.
If you have a code to not procreate, then how to you continue the code?
Genes are just one part of the story. Then there’s epigenetics. Gene expression based on external triggers, and so on.
Identical twin studies have shown when one is gay, the other is only gay about 50% of the time.
If it was hardcoded and immutable, unchangeable, the second twin would have to be gay 100% of the time.
The fact it isn’t shows there is no hardcoding that people simply cannot help but be gay.
It's not the presence of the gene - it's the activation.
Here's two more pieces of proof: The ex-lebsos Anne Heche and Mrs. Bill DeBlasio.
Besides, you’d have to also study a straight population to see how often these genes are present, and then compare the two. The findings are incomplete.
Identical twin studies have shown when one is gay, the other is only gay about 50% of the time.
I suspect that the gay gene will be found for men, and for women it may never be found, or show a much lower “genetic-linked” rate for women.
Either that, or they’ll find a gene that gives women an affinity for plaid, overalls, and being fat and cranky, which also links to an aversion to men.
Science proved years ago that the DNA of identical twins were not always mirror images. If it were then how could one twin develop asthma or leukemia or other cancers without the other one developing it as well?
10 time more likely than normal (1/20).