Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BlackLight Power Announces Generation of Millions of Watts of Power
http://www.financialpost.com/markets/news/BlackLight+Power+Announces+Game+Changing+Achievement+Generation+Millions/9384649/story.html ^

Posted on 01/15/2014 4:26:24 PM PST by Kevmo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-455 next last
To: white_wolf
Show it!
***Build one yourself, if you have the means. Just follow the MFMP recipe.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3091404/posts‎

Nov 10, 2013 - Posted on 11/14/2013 2:42:17 PM PST by Kevmo MFMP detects GAMMA rays in LENR experiment
21 posted on 01/15/2014 4:48:08 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: white_wolf

Just don’t click on the thread.

Simple and quiet.


22 posted on 01/15/2014 4:49:10 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Gee, if I applied 12,000 amps at 83 volts to something, I would have 1 million watts as well!

What a bogus story!!!!!


23 posted on 01/15/2014 4:49:32 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

If I had invented an alternate energy source that threatened to displace the coal, nuclear, and oil industries, I would be expecting to have a terrible accident sooner rather than later.


24 posted on 01/15/2014 4:49:35 PM PST by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Me, too. Anytime that someone comes out with the newest whiz-bang super gizmo, I am skeptical.


25 posted on 01/15/2014 4:51:13 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The War on Drugs has been used as an excuse to steal your rights. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

12,000 amps at 83 volts
***I haven’t seen those figures, where did you get them?


26 posted on 01/15/2014 4:52:50 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
Since Kevmo -- aka Charlatan #1 -- accuses you of uninformed ridicule, here's some informed ridicule. The eigenstates of hydrogen atoms have been known since 1925. That is almost 90 years ago. Their solution is EXACT. There are no "lower energy states" of Hydrogen, and naming them Hydrogino, Hydrogenoid, Hydroteenyweeny, or Hydrobogus doesn't change the facts.

The patent application listed is over three years old, and will never be granted. More ESP/astrology/crystal power/spirit channeling/alien abduction quality "science" from the indefatigable Charlatan #1.

No doubt Wonder Warthog [aka Charlatan #2] will be weighing in shortly to tell us the Hydrogenies have been seen "over 14,000 times" by various "highly qualified researchers" and "only not seen one time" by failed haoxers at MIT.

27 posted on 01/15/2014 4:54:11 PM PST by FredZarguna (Das is nicht richtig nur falsch. Das ist nicht einmal falsch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

And yet, these same idiots will come on other threads and piss and moan about how we’re falling behind in science and technology.

This is damned interesting, is all I can say based on limited reading I’ve done. Of course it’s easier to just ridicule than engage in actual intellectual activity.


28 posted on 01/15/2014 4:54:33 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
In a paper published in Physics Letters A, Norman Dombey concluded that Mills' theoretical hydrino states are unphysical. For the hydrino states, the binding strength increases as the strength of the electric potential decreases, with maximum binding strength when the potential has disappeared completely, where Dombey remarked "We could call these anomalous states "homeopathic" states because the smaller the coupling, the larger the effect." The model also assumes that the nuclear charge distribution is a point rather than having an arbitrarily small non-zero radius. It also lacks an analogous solution in the Schrödinger equation, which governs non-relativistic systems. Dombey concluded: "We suggest that outside of science fiction this is sufficient reason to disregard them." From a suggestion in Dombey's paper, further work by Antonio Di Castro has shown that states below the ground state, as described in Mills' work, are incompatible with the Schrödinger, Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations, key equations in the study of quantum systems.
29 posted on 01/15/2014 4:56:44 PM PST by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Actual picture.

30 posted on 01/15/2014 4:57:54 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

So, BLP has something to demo. Let’s see what happens on the 28th. They’ve had 60 million in financing. Although I think people are gullible and don’t know science but they do see an investment opportunity, nevertheless, I’m sure there are also smart investors who must have seen something. Hopefully these tests are backed by some independent outsiders measuring the input and output.

Is the BLP process even LENR or is it something else? Since they are working with hydrogen it would seem to be fusion but I think they only end up with hydrogen ‘hydrinos’ so I don’t think this is true LENR.

They also are working with folks from Rowan university which is a real university, Randall Mills has a real chemical engineering degree as well as an MD from Harvard, no diploma mill for him. I’ve been following BLP for a while. It would be awesome if they have something so I hope it isn’t a Rossi type demo where outside people can’t measure the inputs or outputs.


31 posted on 01/15/2014 4:58:55 PM PST by Lx (Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna; Kartographer

Kartographer said he would not sign onto these LENR threads, so we’ll see if he’s a man of his word.

You, on the other hand, are simply the latest skeptopath who claims to have advanced science degrees but can’t seem to put together more than 3 posts without a freshman level logical fallacy.


32 posted on 01/15/2014 4:59:42 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"great! where can i buy one?"

I think this is what you're looking for, but you'll have to buy A LOT of them to get that kinda juice outta of 'em!


33 posted on 01/15/2014 5:02:53 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

The patent application listed is over three years old, and will never be granted.
***Well, that didn’t take long. Here’s your first logical fallacy: an argument from silence. In this case, the silence is the future.

More ESP/astrology/crystal power/spirit channeling/alien abduction quality “science” from the indefatigable Charlatan #1.
***Logical fallacy: Horse Laugh.

No doubt Wonder Warthog [aka Charlatan #2] will be weighing in shortly to tell us the Hydrogenies have been seen “over 14,000 times” by various “highly qualified researchers” and “only not seen one time” by failed haoxers at MIT.
***Logical fallacy: straw argument. Has WW logged onto this thread & weighed in? NO. So, arguing against what you THINK he will say is yet another of your many, many logical fallacies. BTW, I’m the one —rather than WW — who keeps mentioning the 14,000 replications of the Pons-Fleischmann Anomalous Heat Effect, but you haven’t bothered to look into the science behind that claim.


34 posted on 01/15/2014 5:03:45 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo; Erik Latranyi
I haven’t seen those figures, where did you get them?

The article says the input current is 12,000 amps. You then apply the super-dark-matter-anti-atomic-hydrino conversion formula (which look suspiciously like the ordinary result of electrical power output from the definition of voltage and current) to 1,000,000 / 12,000 and get ... wait for it ... wait for it ... 83 volts.

In other words, at these amperages, ordinary house voltage will yield a megawatt, plus a lot of steam. Which is typical of the raving lunacies that Kevmo posts.

35 posted on 01/15/2014 5:03:54 PM PST by FredZarguna (Das is nicht richtig nur falsch. Das ist nicht einmal falsch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

If there was an easy,cheap and clean way to produce an electrical current, mankind would have discovered it by now.


36 posted on 01/15/2014 5:03:57 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

We’re falling behind in science and technology because idiots post bogus crap like this and morons believe it.


37 posted on 01/15/2014 5:05:46 PM PST by FredZarguna (Das is nicht richtig nur falsch. Das ist nicht einmal falsch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sefarkas

Is it possible that Dombey is wrong? After all, BLP announced that they GENERATED millions of W of power. How did they do it? Or is it a gigantic fraud somehow?


38 posted on 01/15/2014 5:06:05 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lx

independent outsiders measuring the input and output.
***Umm, that’s what ELFORSK did with 7 independent scientists on an E-Cat and it still wasn’t good enough for the skeptopaths.


39 posted on 01/15/2014 5:07:24 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lx

Is the BLP process even LENR or is it something else?
***Yes, I think it’s LENR.

Since they are working with hydrogen it would seem to be fusion but I think they only end up with hydrogen ‘hydrinos’ so I don’t think this is true LENR.
***Like other LENR researchers, Mills has his own pet theory.

They also are working with folks from Rowan university which is a real university, Randall Mills has a real chemical engineering degree as well as an MD from Harvard, no diploma mill for him. I’ve been following BLP for a while. It would be awesome if they have something so I hope it isn’t a Rossi type demo where outside people can’t measure the inputs or outputs.
***We shall see. No matter how things work out, it is obvious that LENR is one tricky beast.


40 posted on 01/15/2014 5:09:44 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-455 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson