Posted on 11/02/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Since you bring up the subject, a facebook friend of mine posted this last night.
BUSTED! LAX False Flag Shooting Hoax Exposed!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYE20A7K9w0
You don't see a difference between private gun ownership and arming a paramilitary unit as part of their job. You qualify for TSA employment.
I would not doubt that it was. I won’t say that it was, but I won’t argue that it wasn’t.
“You support the 2nd or you don’t..despite what you say you obviously don’t.”
The federal employees having firearms is OK when the people can have them, otherwise it is just tyranny.
Not to arm the TSA but to bring Nat’l Guard in maybe?
You might be on to something
I agree. If they acknowledge that he existed, then they would have to confront him. It is easier to go into the slaughter pen blissfully in denial than to have to make painful choices to some.
NO!
Every illegal act can precipitate an action. Let's remain focused on the problem rather than conspiracies.
I’m not objecting to the TSA, no matter how dense they may be, to arming themselves on their own time and own dime. My objection has to doing with arming them on the taxpayer dime. Even your lowly Barney Fife in a small town has to pass that test before he gets a firearm to go with his badge. The TSA should be no different.
My guess off the top of my head is it would cost another $100,000 in training per union TSA agent.
Training dolts to do a soldier’s job is very, very expensive. There is a reason that even the lowest position in the army won’t be offered to anyone without at least a high school education.
No. Airports already have armed security. And really if they wanted TSA armed they’d be armed. People need to stop obsessing on false flags, it’s pathetic and stupid. Somebody read about them once and now half the people out there think every fart is a false flag, most events are just events, not tied to anything.
Armed personnel currently in most airports include local police, airport security, sheriff’s dept. deputies, air marshals, Nat. Guard, FBI and most likely ATF agents. That's probably enough.
It would seem that would be plenty of "security", though we know the left always demands perfection when it comes to their safety and security......at the expense of everyone else of course.
If there is a need for more armed security I would think it would be better to increase one of those existing units rather than form yet another one. For both cost and response coordination considerations. Just a thought.
” Let’s remain focused on the problem”
The TSA is a problem and them becoming armed has been an issue. They already were issued “badges”, similar to law enforcement badges, to wear on their uniforms to intimidate the people, so it isn’t stretch to think they may become armed.
Yes, BUT the TSA did NOT shoot up the airport killing one and wounding others.
“Yes, BUT the TSA did NOT shoot up the airport killing one and wounding others. “
So? Give them guns and watch that happen!
I never endorsed giving them guns. Do you read and comprehend what is written?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.