To: Clump
Now my conspiracy radar is kicking in.
Did the government want to see how far they could push us?
The implications of such a thing are..huge. No joking.
18 posted on
10/17/2013 8:29:28 AM PDT by
KittenClaws
( You may have to fight a battle more than once in order to win it." - Margaret Thatcher)
To: KittenClaws
My conspiracy sneakosope has been spinning like a top since ‘96. I’m used to it anymore.
To: KittenClaws
The cuts from the sequestration taught them that they needed to make the shutdown more painful, more visible, and more aggravating, for more people in order to get what they wanted. It was a massive political temper tantrum and worked pretty much as the liberals intended.
38 posted on
10/17/2013 9:10:53 AM PDT by
eggman
(End the Obama occupation of the White House!)
To: KittenClaws
Did the government want to see how far they could push us?
Of course, why else would the National Park Service Federales violate the constitutional rights of American Citizens.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3080194/posts That's why the threat of shutting down food stamps, and the various “glitches” that have happened to the system.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3079650/posts
The pResident is running a protection racket, showing America what he can do if he is denied his way. I think he is also testing to see just what the reaction will be to various scenarios should they come to pass.
45 posted on
10/17/2013 11:13:11 AM PDT by
Idaho_Cowboy
(Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson