SNOPES

Email | 10/10/2013 | Self

[dvan]

If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete. However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution, by all means, PASS it ON!

There truly is tyranny afoot

[DJ MacWoW]

Actually this has been known for sometime. She has needed to recuse herself from several cases but has not.

[TexasGator]

” Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets.”

Actually that is NOT what Snopes said. It said the dockets existed but did not pertain to his ‘eligibility’ issue as stated in the email. One needs to research each docket to verify this.

[wordsofearnest]

Can the Chief Justice force her to recuse herself?

[Lurking Libertarian]

That’s correct. None of those was an eligibility case.

[DJ MacWoW]

That I don’t know but I wouldn’t count on Roberts to be honest. Seems to me Roberts kids were threatened because they weren’t adopted from where Roberts stated they were. That was on FR awhile back.

[humblegunner]

If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete.

You know of a way to delete threads on Free Republic?

[mountainlion]

So where you gona go to find the truth?

[Spunky]

You have been a member since 2000. Where have you been all this time?

Most of us have read and known about Elana Kagan defending Barack Obama for some time now.

[Idaho_Cowboy]

I've wondered for years who died and appointed Snopes a deity. I treat Snopes like anything else on the Internet and anyone that hides their agenda already has some honesty issues.

[rktman]

NEVER, NEVER trust snopes as the definitive source.

[JohnGerald]

Uh, even WND backtracked from the claim you are making.

http://www.wnd.com/2010/08/187797/

"Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly described a series of cases for which Elena Kagan represented the government as eligibility cases. Those cases, in fact, were a series of unrelated disputes pending before the Supreme Court and the references have been removed from this report."

Look, I get it that Obama is bad. He has passed Klintoon, LBJ and Carter as the worst President in our history. There are a host of legitimate reasons to criticize Obama.

However, one of the main weapons that the left has in its arsenal is ridicule. They have succeeded in using ridicule to help capture an entire generation of young people. Posting stuff like this only makes the job of the left easier.

[CodeToad]

Snopes is run by an extreme left-wing man/woman team that are fanatic Obama supporters and have been caught in one lie after another.

[Usagi_yo]

No, but Congress can. Congress can Censor and impeach federal judges. Censor is probably best option, it just means her vote doesn’t count either side.

[Boogieman]

No. None of the Justices have that kind of power over the other Justices.

The only remedy is impeachment by Congress.

[MrB]

Snopes is good for debunking “kidney removal in the bathtub” stories,

but nothing even remotely political.

[MrB]

That was tried once, and they couldn’t even remove a blatant drunkard from the bench

and wasn’t tried again since.

[Boogieman]

I think you mean censure, and no, Congress has no authority to censure the Supreme Court justices. It's impeachment or nothing.

[RitaOK]

Now, now, don’t discourage the youngsters, with young skulls full of mush. Many of them who have not had a clue, are just now tuning in. Lets hope to bring them along in a hurry.

I’m razzing you. Old news is new news to so many. The following comes to mind, naturally.

“Those who fail to remember history are condemned to repeat it.”

%:D

[DJ MacWoW]

The ONLY thing wrong with the email is that Kagan defended Obama in eligibility cases. That's incorrect. However there is a wealth of information on Kagan defending Obamas positions.

Elena Kagan: The ObamaCare Recusal That Wasn't

There are many more articles about her need to and refusal to recuse herself.