Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nesnah
All three questions could be asked in reverse as well. That’s why this is such an important discussion.

It is an important question, but as the law currently stands today, he's eligible, you may argue that the law is unconstitutional from an original intent perspective, but that does not mean he is not eligible.

That can all change with one lawsuit ruled upon by the US Supreme court or one law passed by Congress and signed by Zero.
21 posted on 08/27/2013 11:36:54 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

Congress and Zero cannot amend the Constitution by themselves.


22 posted on 08/27/2013 11:38:02 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

“It is an important question, but as the law currently stands today, he’s eligible....”


Huh? There is NO law that defines NBC. You made that point in your 3 questions post.

The reason we’re discussing it here is because nobody knows for sure what NBC really is, but many have strong opinions one way or another.


27 posted on 08/27/2013 11:40:30 AM PDT by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson