To: nesnah
All three questions could be asked in reverse as well. Thats why this is such an important discussion.
It is an important question, but as the law currently stands today, he's eligible, you may argue that the law is unconstitutional from an original intent perspective, but that does not mean he is not eligible.
That can all change with one lawsuit ruled upon by the US Supreme court or one law passed by Congress and signed by Zero.
21 posted on
08/27/2013 11:36:54 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
Congress and Zero cannot amend the Constitution by themselves.
22 posted on
08/27/2013 11:38:02 AM PDT by
nesnah
To: SoConPubbie
“It is an important question, but as the law currently stands today, he’s eligible....”
Huh? There is NO law that defines NBC. You made that point in your 3 questions post.
The reason we’re discussing it here is because nobody knows for sure what NBC really is, but many have strong opinions one way or another.
27 posted on
08/27/2013 11:40:30 AM PDT by
nesnah
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson