Didn't answer my question.
Is there a chance that, deep down, consenting soldiers having gay sex bugs you a LOT more than soldiers raping foreign civilian women (even if it's in the country they're supposed to be liberating) because "boys will be boys?"
It's just that I have some knowledge of military history and how soldiers, sailors, etc. have universally behaved for thousands of years, and don't live in some sort of naive fantasyworld where all immorality and depravity magically started a few years or a decade ago.
It's simply the existence of twitter that makes something that was obviously happening long before DADT was repealed that makes this more detectable and visible.
And I personally believe soldiers having consensual sex with each other is far less immoral than soldiers raping civilian women, and not any more immoral than soldiers having sex with prostitutes.
Of all the sick arguments to attempt, to try and end discussion of homosexualizing the military by trying to make the choice between homosexuality versus the American military being rapists.
Strategerist has been zotted. Ding Dong...
Still a poor attempt in the rationalization of degenerate behavior, especially by the degenerates that think monogamy/condoms are dirty words that coincides with the stuff that sticks on their penises when they pull out of their consensual partner's anus.
Real great health practices that you proudly encourage. And here I thought you were more of the rational types that post on here. Not even going into the readiness aspects and yes, homosexuals have always been in the military, just everyone played pretend at work, which has worked out so far. Enjoy Pandora's Jar being open. With more females joining combat operations and open homosexuality, what could go wrong with stable readiness, lol.
Is there a chance that deep down there actually being something such as morals and decency bugs you alot?
Go pee on an electric fence buggerist.