“stfu de facto officer doctrine does not apply”
The De Facto Officer Doctrine does apply to judicial rulings and verdicts from a judge appointed by a usurper unless there is an objection lodged pre-trial.
The Congress and the Court will not interfere with the people’s right to elect a usurper as their leader and Commander-in-Chief. But, an individual can object to adverse action taken against them for following or adhereing to a law signed by a usurper if they make their objection known before trial.
Obama supporters may not object to the Affordable Care and Protection Act signed by Obama. But those who do object, can opt out by objecting when adverse action is taken against them.
Elections have consquences. But, you can opt out if the leader is a usurper.
The Constitution ORDERS Congress to enforce the eligibility requirements in Section Three of the Twentieth Amendment. They ignored their Constitutional duty to do so. Legally, they don't have the luxury of ignoring the issue of eligibility. This also applies to the courts, as all judges swear an oath to support the Constitution, which is not possible if any of it is being ignored. Traitors all.