Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/17/2013 10:05:48 PM PST by ExxonPatrolUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ExxonPatrolUs

It’s GOOD for the Country. That makes it tough on Barry.


2 posted on 02/17/2013 10:14:43 PM PST by sportscaster ("LET'S ROLL")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Pipelines crisscrossing for energy Independence is bad.

High speed rail lines crisscrossing the land carrying foreign oil is good.


3 posted on 02/17/2013 10:15:22 PM PST by NoLibZone (We have the nation we deserve. I predict Freepers will hate GOP Candidates for 2016,2020,2024,2028,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Reduces the dollars flowing to his Muslim benefactors.


4 posted on 02/17/2013 10:18:11 PM PST by NoLibZone (We have the nation we deserve. I predict Freepers will hate GOP Candidates for 2016,2020,2024,2028,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
Why can’t they build a refinery in North Dakota? Ship the oil right across the border from Canada rather then piping it all the way across the country.
5 posted on 02/17/2013 10:47:11 PM PST by political1 (Love your neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
The best thing that could happen to these “environmentalists” would be to single them out and let them do without fossil fuels, coal powered electric plants or natural gas.

They would need to depend on air and wind power. See how that works out..long term. Same thing goes for the white House.

6 posted on 02/17/2013 10:49:35 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Tough choices - now that’s funny.
barry has no tough choices, he looks at an issue and says what can destroy the USA faster and chooses that.
He doesn’t vacillate one iota.


7 posted on 02/17/2013 10:51:57 PM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

That sick scumbag Ubama doesn’t have to fill a gas tank, and the moocher base of the Democrat party mostly rides on those smelly, graffitied pisspots known as city buses, so what does he care if the price of gasoline goes through the roof?

Congratulations, America.


13 posted on 02/18/2013 12:18:25 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Where in the article do they analyze the Economic Good?


16 posted on 02/18/2013 12:54:00 AM PST by Richard Brandon Abroad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

0bama will approve Keystone, if not now, then soon. He betrays most everyone who backs him. Soon, the environazis will feel this betryal.


17 posted on 02/18/2013 12:58:30 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Obama decision could be moot if Canada took Keystone issue to NAFTA Court, which they would win. Canada is forced by NAFTA to send 2/3 of its oil to the US...and a “no” on Keystone not only hurts Canada selling oil to the US...but also to other countries because of 2/3 rule.


19 posted on 02/18/2013 2:41:23 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson