That's according to the exaggerated GJ presentment, not the actual testimony. It just isn't true. Dr. Dranov (a mandatory reporter) asked mm 3 times that night "was there anything sexual?" and got 3 no's back from mm. MM's testimony is still sealed, but Franco asked him point blank what he told Joe and mm told him he told Joe basically nothing. I guess Franco's a liar now too?
It’s a nice attempt at a deflection, but Paterno stated, as shown in the investigation that he knew the nature of the incident “...WAS SEXUAL IN NATURE...”
The screen shot is even shown in this propaganda video, lol.
That is not what he testified at the trial.
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/22/nation/la-na-nn-sandusky-jury-20120622
Maybe you believe what Franco claims he was told by McQueary holds more weight than his testimony under oath in court. I do not. Of course Franco could not lie, former pro football players are all awesome and upstanding folks. Everybody knows that.