1 posted on
01/21/2013 7:24:58 AM PST by
traumer
To: traumer
From what I understand, if the work force participation rate was what it was in 2009, the U3 rate would have steadily been over 10% for the last three years.
2 posted on
01/21/2013 7:29:17 AM PST by
TwelveOfTwenty
(Ho, ho, hey, hey, I'm BUYcotting Chick-Fil-A)
To: traumer
When Obama was inaugurated in January 2009, there were 80,507,000 American civilians age 16 or older who did not have a job or seek one. In December 2012, there were 88,839,000thus, the increase of 8,332,000. Riddle me this! How much additional revenue (isn't that what every progressive on the Sunday talk shows wants?) would be generated simply by having these people employed!?!
3 posted on
01/21/2013 7:31:57 AM PST by
YankeeReb
To: traumer
” who decided not to work or even to seek a job”..... ??
4 posted on
01/21/2013 7:34:28 AM PST by
traumer
To: traumer
And thus, a new anacronym is born.....NILFs.
(not to be confused with MILFs!!)
To: traumer
Going Gault, or going Broke?
7 posted on
01/21/2013 7:58:31 AM PST by
Hotlanta Mike
("Governing a great natiorn is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson