Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: x
"But for many of us who saw the film, it's hard not to think of the book in terms of the movie. However awful Robert Redford may be in however many ways, he did make the role his own, at least for me."

I read the book (a couple times) before the movie. I think that Redford was already too much of an established "A-lister" and too familiar for a character who was supposed to have suddenly shot to the top from a murky, obscure past; Redford would have made a better Tom Buchanan.

You're right on about Toby McGuire. He's too much a whiney, snively brat. Carraway was something of a stoic, traditionalist with midwestern sensibilities. I'll be very surprised if he pulls it off.

131 posted on 12/01/2012 11:01:10 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack
I think that Redford was already too much of an established "A-lister" and too familiar for a character who was supposed to have suddenly shot to the top from a murky, obscure past

When I saw the movie, I wasn't familiar with the actors, so it was easy for me to imagine that they were Gatsby and Daisy, Nick and Tom. Karen Black, though, as Myrtle was too over the top for me.

There was also an A&E television version. I remember it as Paul Rudd as Gatsby, which would really have been miscasting, but actually he was Nick, and wasn't awful in the role. Gatsby was Toby Stephens, an English actor who maybe did have that "came from nowhere and shot to the top" quality. Daisy was Mira Sorvino -- not quite right.

136 posted on 12/01/2012 11:07:58 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson