[longtermmemmory]

“A report” is not a trial.

An accused should have the right (does have the right) to face and examine the accusers. To examine their SCIENTIFIC basis for their accusations.

mere blah blah is not enough. then it is just he said vs he said.

What about the personal vendettas?

If armstrong and his lawyers can’t take that appart then the accusation stands. If the accusation can’t stand the light of examination then it should and must fail.

With a few dollars and personal vendettas ANYONE can be smeared with anything.

[Uncle Chip]

An accused should have the right (does have the right) to face and examine the accusers.

He did. Armstrong had the opportunity to take the case to arbitration but he declined.

Ask yourself WHY??? It's not for lack of money which he has plenty of -- a little less now.

[1rudeboy]

“A report” is not a trial.

And Lance is not in jail.