Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Aria
If they dug up something they shouldn't have and could be prosecuted for getting then they made a big mistake by not really being anonymous.

Seems a perfectly rational conclusion if what they have is illegal to have. Looks like they've been pretty sloppy so far. Yes, small time amateurs.
161 posted on 10/17/2012 11:58:56 PM PDT by lmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: lmr; Aria
check the source probably small time losers handed some fake docs and they will take the fall. use spokeo or a good back ground check including criminal records.if it was really good stuff against obama it would probably go to Breitbart or WND who would fact check it..if against Romney would anyone fact check it or check it like Candy?

what other reason that putting in the statement about watch the debate would they say that unless they knew ahead of time? sounds like a dirty tricks planned conspiracy like National Guard Records.. Why the drama? release them now unless they just don't want time to be refuted before next debate...their source requested they wait 5 days? why?

179 posted on 10/18/2012 7:11:38 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson