Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: downtownconservative

I think the moral is that a vehicle the size of a Buick can’t drive around using solar panels for power.  If NASA could have used solar in this case, I’m sure they would have; it would surely be less expensive.


5 posted on 08/18/2012 1:02:56 AM PDT by Joseph Harrolds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Joseph Harrolds
NASA would have used PV solar if they could because of politics - not cost. The solar array for Curiosity and it's batteries would dramatically increase the size, throw weight, etc. of the project. The PU generator is small and has a very high density energy production. Nuclear power generation of electricity is far lower cost on earth than PV solar, so why wouldn't it even be more so on a planet with less sunlight and a very simple radioisotope electric generator?
11 posted on 08/18/2012 5:57:57 AM PDT by 103198
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson