[bluetick]

For instance...

Let’s assume there just wasn’t enough evidence or whatver to charge/try/convinct Sandusky at the time...

based upon what he knew, Paterno could have said something like this:

“That sick SOB Sandusky who takes little boys on trips to bowl games and shares his room with them has been seen by one of our asst. coaches fondling a little boy in the showrs. And now, sopme ten years later, he is still walking around! Either do something about it or I QUIT!”

“Oh.. wait!!! I can’t quit!!! Otherwise, Bobby Bowden will have more wins than me or something”

[Uncle Chip]

based upon what he knew, Paterno could have said something like this:

And who should he have said that to??? the Department of Public Welfare that approved Sandusky as fit to be an adoptive parent or the Department of Public Welfare that exonerated Sandusky in an earlier incident and the department that would have investigated this one.