Point well taken, but it only strengthens mine. Sandusky was allowed to continue roaming the facilities for a decade or thereabouts after the “fondling” incident (he even continued to have an office at PSU iirc). Why do you suppose they banned him from bringing his boy toys to campus any longer?
They only banned him from bringing kids into the showers to eliminate the potential for anymore incidents where abuse could occur.
As far as his office, it was part of his retirement agreement negotiated with the university and not something that could be unilaterally just taken away.
The administrators contacted his charity expecting that it would do something to reel Sandusky in — but in retrospect it didn’t, even though its CEO was Dr Raykovitz, a child psychologist with connections to Child Youth Services and the Department of Public Welfare.
And according to the Freeh Report, the plan worked out by Curley, Schultz and Spanier with legal counsel was to also notify the DPW directly. What happened to that will have to come from Curley as it was on his To Do list.