Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Freeh’s report was complete and total bunk, paid for by the Board of Trustees. They got exactly what they wanted. “They protected Jerry to save the football program’s image”. Nonsense. There was zero evidence linking Paterno to the coverup. There was nothing from anyone involved saying “we gotta keep this under wraps or it’ll hurt recruiting”. No evidence even remotely touching on any of that. But those were Freeh’s conclusions and what the media ran with.

It stinks to high heaven. They administrators weren’t protecting the football program, they were protecting somebody else very high in power (either financial or political power, or both.)


13 posted on 08/14/2012 12:04:35 PM PDT by jb729
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: jb729
Calling Freeh’s report “bunk” is talking through your hat. The report named names and, from my reading, put the blame where it belonged.

I have no connection to PSU but this really is over reaching. Penn State will pay for this for decades. If the university is destroyed, who will compensate the aggrieved ?

24 posted on 08/14/2012 12:13:05 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (I didn't post this. Someone else did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: jb729

“There was zero evidence linking Paterno to the coverup.”

I had read that there were emails to and from Paterno specifically showing Paterno’s culpability.


30 posted on 08/14/2012 12:16:11 PM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (I wanna start a Seniors' Motor Scooter Gang. Wanna join?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: jb729

There was zero evidence linking Paterno to the coverup. There was nothing from anyone involved saying “we gotta keep this under wraps or it’ll hurt recruiting...

...PSU koolaid drinkers ought to be put into psychology texts for future study in denial tendencies...so by your logic, or lack of same, if there is no tangible evidence trail in which someone screams out in big, bold letters ‘we did it, we’re guilty, punish us’, then there is no crime...hate to be prosecutor in your world...the Freeh report was meticulously organized, with copious documents, many not relevant, some more so...but I do believe Freeh has a little bit more info at hand than you do, for all your blathering on this forum...
...Since you seem to think Paterno had nothing to do with anything, how do you explain his telling the GJ that he knew of no similar prior incidident with Sandusky and a boy in the shower, when everyone with a warm brain knows he knew about the 1999 incident...in other words, why did Joe tell the jury he knew nothing when he clearly did? Lying under oath, maybe? What’s the name for that? Oh, I forgot...in your world, nothing is culpable, without a banner confession attached to it...


95 posted on 08/15/2012 4:18:04 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson